adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Which software metric approach only deals with the structural complexity of a program?

a.

The McCabe software complexity metric

b.

The Halstead software science metric

c.

The cyclomatic complexity metric

d.

The ABC metric

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (a).The McCabe software complexity metric Explanation:Traditional software metrics approaches such as the McCabe software complexity metric only deal with the structural complexity of the program.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Which software metric approach only deals with the structural complexity of a program?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. Do most .NET obfuscators alter the structure or the representation of the program?

Q. What is the impact of control-flow obfuscation techniques on a program's control-flow graph?

Q. What is the purpose of breaking metadata entries when attempting to prevent disassembly of a .NET assembly?

Q. Is corrupting a .NET assembly's metadata a recommended approach for obfuscation?

Q. What is DotFuscator?

Q. What are the features of DotFuscator?

Q. What is Overload-Induction?

Q. How does DotFuscator rename symbols?

Q. What is the drawback of aggressive control flow obfuscation?

Q. What is Remotesoft Obfuscator and Linker?

Q. What is the purpose of the Linker component in Remotesoft Obfuscator?

Q. What problem do System calls pose in .NET executables?

Q. What is the Remotesoft Obfuscator and what is the difference between it and other obfuscators?

Q. What is the purpose of using a Linker component in the Remotesoft Obfuscator?

Q. What is the difference between the platform-dependent mode and the platform-independent mode in the Remotesoft Protector?

Q. What is the best way to prevent reverse engineering of .NET assemblies?

Q. Why is native code less readable than IL code?

Q. What is the potential vulnerability of precompiled assemblies?

Q. Is it difficult to reverse engineer native code?

Q. Can precompiling your assemblies protect a tiny method that contains your precious algorithm?