adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What problem do System calls pose in .NET executables?

a.

They make it difficult to identify system calls

b.

They make it easier to reverse programs

c.

They provide much needed information about a code snippet

d.

They are not relevant to .NET executables

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (c).They provide much needed information about a code snippet Explanation:No matter how well an assembly might be obfuscated, it is still going to have highly informative calls to the System namespace that can reveal a lot about the code being examined.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What problem do System calls pose in .NET executables?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the Remotesoft Obfuscator and what is the difference between it and other obfuscators?

Q. What is the purpose of using a Linker component in the Remotesoft Obfuscator?

Q. What is the difference between the platform-dependent mode and the platform-independent mode in the Remotesoft Protector?

Q. What is the best way to prevent reverse engineering of .NET assemblies?

Q. Why is native code less readable than IL code?

Q. What is the potential vulnerability of precompiled assemblies?

Q. Is it difficult to reverse engineer native code?

Q. Can precompiling your assemblies protect a tiny method that contains your precious algorithm?

Q. What is the alternative option offered by Protector for those not willing to sacrifice portability for security?

Q. What is the role of the native redistributable DLL included in Protector's encrypted assemblies?

Q. Is the encrypted IL code 100 percent platform-independent?

Q. What hashing algorithm is used by Protector to create the key for encrypting the IL code?

Q. What is the encryption algorithm used by Protector to encrypt the IL code?

Q. What is the best way to prevent people from reverse engineering .NET assemblies?

Q. What is the major weakness of encrypting IL code in assemblies?

Q. Why is obfuscation considered to be a stronger protection method than encryption?

Q. What is the typical limitation of any code encryption technique?

Q. What is the process required to reverse engineer an assembly generated by Protector?

Q. Why is the decryption process of an assembly generated by Protector quite simple?

Q. Why should you always obfuscate a program before passing it through an encryption-based packer like Remotesoft Protector?