adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What is the difference between the platform-dependent mode and the platform-independent mode in the Remotesoft Protector?

a.

The platform-dependent mode precompiles the IL code into native IA-32 code, while the platform-independent mode encrypts the IL code inside the executable.

b.

The platform-dependent mode encrypts the IL code inside the executable, while the platform-independent mode precompiles the IL code into native IA-32 code.

c.

The platform-dependent mode completely eliminates the IL code from the distributable assembly, while the platform-independent mode encrypts the IL code inside the executable.

d.

The platform-dependent mode encrypts the IL code inside the executable and hides it inside the assembly, while the platform-independent mode completely eliminates the IL code from the distributable assembly.

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (a).The platform-dependent mode precompiles the IL code into native IA-32 code, while the platform-independent mode encrypts the IL code inside the executable. Explanation:The platform-dependent mode in the Remotesoft Protector precompiles the IL code into native IA-32 code, which completely eliminates the IL code from the distributable assembly. The platform-independent mode encrypts the IL code inside the executable instead of entirely eliminating it. In this mode, the Protector encrypts IL instructions and hides them inside the executable.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What is the difference between the platform-dependent mode and the platform-independent mode in the Remotesoft Protector?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the best way to prevent reverse engineering of .NET assemblies?

Q. Why is native code less readable than IL code?

Q. What is the potential vulnerability of precompiled assemblies?

Q. Is it difficult to reverse engineer native code?

Q. Can precompiling your assemblies protect a tiny method that contains your precious algorithm?

Q. What is the alternative option offered by Protector for those not willing to sacrifice portability for security?

Q. What is the role of the native redistributable DLL included in Protector's encrypted assemblies?

Q. Is the encrypted IL code 100 percent platform-independent?

Q. What hashing algorithm is used by Protector to create the key for encrypting the IL code?

Q. What is the encryption algorithm used by Protector to encrypt the IL code?

Q. What is the best way to prevent people from reverse engineering .NET assemblies?

Q. What is the major weakness of encrypting IL code in assemblies?

Q. Why is obfuscation considered to be a stronger protection method than encryption?

Q. What is the typical limitation of any code encryption technique?

Q. What is the process required to reverse engineer an assembly generated by Protector?

Q. Why is the decryption process of an assembly generated by Protector quite simple?

Q. Why should you always obfuscate a program before passing it through an encryption-based packer like Remotesoft Protector?

Q. What makes .NET code more vulnerable to reverse engineering compared to other processor architectures?

Q. What is the limited effect of obfuscators?

Q. What is one potential strategy for creating more powerful obfuscators?