adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What is the drawback of aggressive control flow obfuscation?

a.

It creates confusion for experienced reversers

b.

It confuses decompilers and may result in incorrect control flow graphs

c.

It increases the size of obfuscated executables

d.

It slows down the execution of obfuscated code

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (b).It confuses decompilers and may result in incorrect control flow graphs Explanation:Aggressive control flow obfuscation can confuse decompilers and may result in incorrect control flow graphs.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What is the drawback of aggressive control flow obfuscation?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is Remotesoft Obfuscator and Linker?

Q. What is the purpose of the Linker component in Remotesoft Obfuscator?

Q. What problem do System calls pose in .NET executables?

Q. What is the Remotesoft Obfuscator and what is the difference between it and other obfuscators?

Q. What is the purpose of using a Linker component in the Remotesoft Obfuscator?

Q. What is the difference between the platform-dependent mode and the platform-independent mode in the Remotesoft Protector?

Q. What is the best way to prevent reverse engineering of .NET assemblies?

Q. Why is native code less readable than IL code?

Q. What is the potential vulnerability of precompiled assemblies?

Q. Is it difficult to reverse engineer native code?

Q. Can precompiling your assemblies protect a tiny method that contains your precious algorithm?

Q. What is the alternative option offered by Protector for those not willing to sacrifice portability for security?

Q. What is the role of the native redistributable DLL included in Protector's encrypted assemblies?

Q. Is the encrypted IL code 100 percent platform-independent?

Q. What hashing algorithm is used by Protector to create the key for encrypting the IL code?

Q. What is the encryption algorithm used by Protector to encrypt the IL code?

Q. What is the best way to prevent people from reverse engineering .NET assemblies?

Q. What is the major weakness of encrypting IL code in assemblies?

Q. Why is obfuscation considered to be a stronger protection method than encryption?

Q. What is the typical limitation of any code encryption technique?