adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What is the potential vulnerability of precompiled assemblies?

a.

The metadata can be removed from the assembly

b.

The metadata can be used to improve the readability of the code

c.

The assembly can only run on IA-32 systems

d.

The precompilation process can introduce new vulnerabilities

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (b).The metadata can be used to improve the readability of the code Explanation:Precompiled assemblies still retain their metadata, which is required for the CLR to successfully run them. This means that it might be theoretically possible for a specially crafted native code decompiler to take advantage of this metadata to improve the readability of the code.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What is the potential vulnerability of precompiled assemblies?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. Is it difficult to reverse engineer native code?

Q. Can precompiling your assemblies protect a tiny method that contains your precious algorithm?

Q. What is the alternative option offered by Protector for those not willing to sacrifice portability for security?

Q. What is the role of the native redistributable DLL included in Protector's encrypted assemblies?

Q. Is the encrypted IL code 100 percent platform-independent?

Q. What hashing algorithm is used by Protector to create the key for encrypting the IL code?

Q. What is the encryption algorithm used by Protector to encrypt the IL code?

Q. What is the best way to prevent people from reverse engineering .NET assemblies?

Q. What is the major weakness of encrypting IL code in assemblies?

Q. Why is obfuscation considered to be a stronger protection method than encryption?

Q. What is the typical limitation of any code encryption technique?

Q. What is the process required to reverse engineer an assembly generated by Protector?

Q. Why is the decryption process of an assembly generated by Protector quite simple?

Q. Why should you always obfuscate a program before passing it through an encryption-based packer like Remotesoft Protector?

Q. What makes .NET code more vulnerable to reverse engineering compared to other processor architectures?

Q. What is the limited effect of obfuscators?

Q. What is one potential strategy for creating more powerful obfuscators?

Q. What is the objective of advanced obfuscating transformations?

Q. What is the .NET Framework?

Q. What is the common language runtime (CLR)?