Question

Why is native code less readable than IL code?

a.

Native code is more complex than IL code

b.

Native code has fewer instructions than IL code

c.

There are no decompilers available for native code

d.

Decompiled native code is not as readable as decompiled IL code

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (d).Decompiled native code is not as readable as decompiled IL code Explanation:Native code is significantly less readable than IL code, and even if there were a decompiler available for native code, it is unlikely that the output would be nearly as readable as the code produced by an IL decompiler.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Why is native code less readable than IL code?

Add Comment

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the potential vulnerability of precompiled assemblies?

View solution

Q. Is it difficult to reverse engineer native code?

View solution

Q. Can precompiling your assemblies protect a tiny method that contains your precious algorithm?

View solution

Q. What is the alternative option offered by Protector for those not willing to sacrifice portability for security?

View solution

Q. What is the role of the native redistributable DLL included in Protector's encrypted assemblies?

View solution

Q. Is the encrypted IL code 100 percent platform-independent?

View solution

Q. What hashing algorithm is used by Protector to create the key for encrypting the IL code?

View solution

Q. What is the encryption algorithm used by Protector to encrypt the IL code?

View solution

Q. What is the best way to prevent people from reverse engineering .NET assemblies?

View solution

Q. What is the major weakness of encrypting IL code in assemblies?

View solution

Q. Why is obfuscation considered to be a stronger protection method than encryption?

View solution

Q. What is the typical limitation of any code encryption technique?

View solution

Q. What is the process required to reverse engineer an assembly generated by Protector?

View solution

Q. Why is the decryption process of an assembly generated by Protector quite simple?

View solution

Q. Why should you always obfuscate a program before passing it through an encryption-based packer like Remotesoft Protector?

View solution

Q. What makes .NET code more vulnerable to reverse engineering compared to other processor architectures?

View solution

Q. What is the limited effect of obfuscators?

View solution

Q. What is one potential strategy for creating more powerful obfuscators?

View solution

Q. What is the objective of advanced obfuscating transformations?

View solution

Q. What is the .NET Framework?

View solution

View All MCQs on Reverse Engineering

Suggested Topics

Are you eager to expand your knowledge beyond Reverse Engineering? We've curated a selection of related categories that you might find intriguing.

Click on the categories below to discover a wealth of MCQs and enrich your understanding of Computer Science. Happy exploring!

Discrete Mathematics

Refine your mathematical skills essential for computer science with our Discrete...

Data Structures and Algorithms

Journey through the fundamentals of Data Structures and Algorithms with our extensive...

Digital Communication

Master the basics of electronic communication with our Digital Communication MCQs....

Formal Languages and Automata Theory

Discover the mathematical models of computation with our Formal Languages and...

MongoDB

Learn the leading NoSQL database with our MongoDB MCQs. Understand everything from...

Computer Graphics

Step into the visual side of computing with our Computer Graphics MCQs. Cover topics...

Software Engineering

Learn about the systematic approach to developing software with our Software...

Human Computer Interaction

Enhance your knowledge of Human-Computer Interaction with our specialized MCQs....

UNIX

Become proficient with the Unix operating system using our UNIX MCQs. Learn about...