Question

Is corrupting a .NET assembly's metadata a recommended approach for obfuscation?

a.

Yes, it is a highly recommended approach

b.

No, it is not a recommended approach

c.

It depends on the type of program being obfuscated

d.

It depends on the size of the program being obfuscated

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (b).No, it is not a recommended approach Explanation:Corrupting the assembly's metadata is not a pretty approach for obfuscation and is generally not recommended, especially considering how easy it is for developers of decompilers or disassemblers to work around these kinds of tricks.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Is corrupting a .NET assembly's metadata a recommended approach for obfuscation?

Add Comment

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is DotFuscator?

View solution

Q. What are the features of DotFuscator?

View solution

Q. What is Overload-Induction?

View solution

Q. How does DotFuscator rename symbols?

View solution

Q. What is the drawback of aggressive control flow obfuscation?

View solution

Q. What is Remotesoft Obfuscator and Linker?

View solution

Q. What is the purpose of the Linker component in Remotesoft Obfuscator?

View solution

Q. What problem do System calls pose in .NET executables?

View solution

Q. What is the Remotesoft Obfuscator and what is the difference between it and other obfuscators?

View solution

Q. What is the purpose of using a Linker component in the Remotesoft Obfuscator?

View solution

Q. What is the difference between the platform-dependent mode and the platform-independent mode in the Remotesoft Protector?

View solution

Q. What is the best way to prevent reverse engineering of .NET assemblies?

View solution

Q. Why is native code less readable than IL code?

View solution

Q. What is the potential vulnerability of precompiled assemblies?

View solution

Q. Is it difficult to reverse engineer native code?

View solution

Q. Can precompiling your assemblies protect a tiny method that contains your precious algorithm?

View solution

Q. What is the alternative option offered by Protector for those not willing to sacrifice portability for security?

View solution

Q. What is the role of the native redistributable DLL included in Protector's encrypted assemblies?

View solution

Q. Is the encrypted IL code 100 percent platform-independent?

View solution

Q. What hashing algorithm is used by Protector to create the key for encrypting the IL code?

View solution

View All MCQs on Reverse Engineering

Suggested Topics

Are you eager to expand your knowledge beyond Reverse Engineering? We've curated a selection of related categories that you might find intriguing.

Click on the categories below to discover a wealth of MCQs and enrich your understanding of Computer Science. Happy exploring!

IT Fundamentals

Navigate the basics of information technology with our IT Fundamentals MCQs. Get a...

Cyber Security

Understand the fundamentals of safeguarding digital assets with our Cyber Security...

Artificial Intelligence

Get started on the path to the future with our Artificial Intelligence MCQs. Covering...

Formal Languages and Automata Theory

Discover the mathematical models of computation with our Formal Languages and...

Human Computer Interaction

Enhance your knowledge of Human-Computer Interaction with our specialized MCQs....

Digital Logic Design

Understand the foundation of digital computers with our Digital Logic Design MCQs....

CSS

Polish your web design skills with our CSS MCQs. Learn about selectors, properties,...

Data Warehousing and OLAP

Strengthen your knowledge of Data Warehousing and OLAP with our specialized MCQs....

Java Spring Framework

Enhance your Java development skills with our Spring Framework MCQs. Learn about...