adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Do most .NET obfuscators alter the structure or the representation of the program?

a.

They primarily alter the structure of the program

b.

They primarily alter the representation of the program

c.

They alter both the structure and representation of the program equally

d.

They have no effect on either the structure or representation of the program

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (b).They primarily alter the representation of the program Explanation:Most of the .NET obfuscators primarily alter the representation of the program, not its structure.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Do most .NET obfuscators alter the structure or the representation of the program?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the impact of control-flow obfuscation techniques on a program's control-flow graph?

Q. What is the purpose of breaking metadata entries when attempting to prevent disassembly of a .NET assembly?

Q. Is corrupting a .NET assembly's metadata a recommended approach for obfuscation?

Q. What is DotFuscator?

Q. What are the features of DotFuscator?

Q. What is Overload-Induction?

Q. How does DotFuscator rename symbols?

Q. What is the drawback of aggressive control flow obfuscation?

Q. What is Remotesoft Obfuscator and Linker?

Q. What is the purpose of the Linker component in Remotesoft Obfuscator?

Q. What problem do System calls pose in .NET executables?

Q. What is the Remotesoft Obfuscator and what is the difference between it and other obfuscators?

Q. What is the purpose of using a Linker component in the Remotesoft Obfuscator?

Q. What is the difference between the platform-dependent mode and the platform-independent mode in the Remotesoft Protector?

Q. What is the best way to prevent reverse engineering of .NET assemblies?

Q. Why is native code less readable than IL code?

Q. What is the potential vulnerability of precompiled assemblies?

Q. Is it difficult to reverse engineer native code?

Q. Can precompiling your assemblies protect a tiny method that contains your precious algorithm?

Q. What is the alternative option offered by Protector for those not willing to sacrifice portability for security?