adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

How does DotFuscator rename symbols?

a.

Using short, single-letter names

b.

Using random combinations of digits and letters

c.

Eliminating namespaces

d.

All of the above

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (d).All of the above Explanation:DotFuscator supports aggressive symbol renaming features that eliminate namespaces and use short, single-letter names to add further confusion.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. How does DotFuscator rename symbols?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the drawback of aggressive control flow obfuscation?

Q. What is Remotesoft Obfuscator and Linker?

Q. What is the purpose of the Linker component in Remotesoft Obfuscator?

Q. What problem do System calls pose in .NET executables?

Q. What is the Remotesoft Obfuscator and what is the difference between it and other obfuscators?

Q. What is the purpose of using a Linker component in the Remotesoft Obfuscator?

Q. What is the difference between the platform-dependent mode and the platform-independent mode in the Remotesoft Protector?

Q. What is the best way to prevent reverse engineering of .NET assemblies?

Q. Why is native code less readable than IL code?

Q. What is the potential vulnerability of precompiled assemblies?

Q. Is it difficult to reverse engineer native code?

Q. Can precompiling your assemblies protect a tiny method that contains your precious algorithm?

Q. What is the alternative option offered by Protector for those not willing to sacrifice portability for security?

Q. What is the role of the native redistributable DLL included in Protector's encrypted assemblies?

Q. Is the encrypted IL code 100 percent platform-independent?

Q. What hashing algorithm is used by Protector to create the key for encrypting the IL code?

Q. What is the encryption algorithm used by Protector to encrypt the IL code?

Q. What is the best way to prevent people from reverse engineering .NET assemblies?

Q. What is the major weakness of encrypting IL code in assemblies?

Q. Why is obfuscation considered to be a stronger protection method than encryption?