adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Is the encrypted IL code 100 percent platform-independent?

a.

Yes

b.

No

c.

May be Yes or No

d.

Can't say

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (b).No Explanation:Encrypted binaries are not 100 percent platform-independent, as native decryption DLLs are still required for each supported platform.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Is the encrypted IL code 100 percent platform-independent?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What hashing algorithm is used by Protector to create the key for encrypting the IL code?

Q. What is the encryption algorithm used by Protector to encrypt the IL code?

Q. What is the best way to prevent people from reverse engineering .NET assemblies?

Q. What is the major weakness of encrypting IL code in assemblies?

Q. Why is obfuscation considered to be a stronger protection method than encryption?

Q. What is the typical limitation of any code encryption technique?

Q. What is the process required to reverse engineer an assembly generated by Protector?

Q. Why is the decryption process of an assembly generated by Protector quite simple?

Q. Why should you always obfuscate a program before passing it through an encryption-based packer like Remotesoft Protector?

Q. What makes .NET code more vulnerable to reverse engineering compared to other processor architectures?

Q. What is the limited effect of obfuscators?

Q. What is one potential strategy for creating more powerful obfuscators?

Q. What is the objective of advanced obfuscating transformations?

Q. What is the .NET Framework?

Q. What is the common language runtime (CLR)?

Q. What is an activation record in .NET?

Q. What is the purpose of decompilers?

Q. What is control flow obfuscation in .NET executables?