adplus-dvertising

Welcome to the Requirements Engineering MCQs Page

Dive deep into the fascinating world of Requirements Engineering with our comprehensive set of Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs). This page is dedicated to exploring the fundamental concepts and intricacies of Requirements Engineering, a crucial aspect of Software Engineering. In this section, you will encounter a diverse range of MCQs that cover various aspects of Requirements Engineering, from the basic principles to advanced topics. Each question is thoughtfully crafted to challenge your knowledge and deepen your understanding of this critical subcategory within Software Engineering.

frame-decoration

Check out the MCQs below to embark on an enriching journey through Requirements Engineering. Test your knowledge, expand your horizons, and solidify your grasp on this vital area of Software Engineering.

Note: Each MCQ comes with multiple answer choices. Select the most appropriate option and test your understanding of Requirements Engineering. You can click on an option to test your knowledge before viewing the solution for a MCQ. Happy learning!

Requirements Engineering MCQs | Page 26 of 30

Explore more Topics under Software Engineering

Q251.
What is the risk of trying to be too literary in the requirements specification?
Discuss
Answer: (b).Contradictions Explanation:When the description of one aspect is given more than once in different words, contradictions may occur, and this risk is especially threatening when one tries to be too literary.
Discuss
Answer: (a).References to aspects of the problem that are defined later on in the text Explanation:The forward references occur in the requirements specification when references to aspects of the problem are only defined later on in the text, especially in large documents that lack a clear structure.
Discuss
Answer: (c).To provide a clear and precise description of the system functionality for both the user and designer Explanation:The requirements specification serves two groups of people - the user and the designer. For the user, it provides a clear and precise description of the system functionality, and for the designer, it is the starting point for the design. The goal is to provide a clear and precise description of the system functionality for both the user and designer.
Q254.
What language is best used in the requirements specification to serve the user in software development?
Discuss
Answer: (b).The language used within the application domain Explanation:The user is best served by a document that speaks their language, the language that is used within the application domain. This ensures a clear and precise description of the functionality that the system has to offer in a language the user understands.
Q255.
What language is best used in the requirements specification to serve the designer in software development?
Discuss
Answer: (a).The expert language of the software engineer Explanation:The designer is best served with a language in which concepts from their world are used, which is often the expert language of the software engineer. A requirements specification phrased in this language may be checked using formal techniques and ensures a clear and precise description of the system functionality in a language the designer understands.
Discuss
Answer: (a).Noise, Silence, Over-specification, Contradictions, Ambiguity, Forward references, Wishful thinking Explanation:Meyer lists seven sins that may beset the analyst when using natural language in a requirements specification: Noise, Silence, Over-specification, Contradictions, Ambiguity, Forward references, and Wishful thinking. These refer to issues that may arise in the requirements specification when using natural language, such as the presence of text elements that do not contain relevant information, the absence of important aspects, over-specification that limits the solution space, and more.
Discuss
Answer: (a).Use of a formal notation first and then translation back into natural language Explanation:Meyer gives an alternative to the use of natural language in requirements specification. According to Meyer, the alternative is to first describe and analyze the problem using some formal notation and then translate it back into natural language. This way, the natural language description obtained will represent a more precise notion of the problem and it will be readable to the user.
Q258.
What does the natural language description obtained after using the alternative given by Meyer represent?
Discuss
Answer: (b).A precise notion of the problem Explanation:The alternative given by Meyer is to first describe and analyze the problem using a formal notation and then translate it back into natural language. The natural language description thus obtained will represent a more precise notion of the problem.
Q259.
What are the visual clues used to distinguish different types of nodes and links in semantic networks?
Discuss
Answer: (a).Shape Explanation:The visual clue used to distinguish different types of nodes and links in semantic networks is shape. Nodes in semantic networks are distinguished by visual clues such as their shape or natural language labels.
Discuss
Answer: (b).To model the data aspect of an information system Explanation:The Entity--Relationship Modeling is a widely-known technique used to model the data aspect of an information system. It provides a way to represent the relationships between entities, such as objects, data elements, and their attributes, in a structured and organized manner. This helps to capture the data requirements and specifications of an information system, and provides a clear understanding of the data structure and relationships. The resulting representation can be used as a basis for database design and implementation.

Suggested Topics

Are you eager to expand your knowledge beyond Software Engineering? We've curated a selection of related categories that you might find intriguing.

Click on the categories below to discover a wealth of MCQs and enrich your understanding of Computer Science. Happy exploring!