Q. What makes .NET code more vulnerable to reverse engineering compared to other processor architectures?

View solution

Q. Why should you always obfuscate a program before passing it through an encryption-based packer like Remotesoft Protector?

View solution

Q. Why is the decryption process of an assembly generated by Protector quite simple?

View solution

Q. What is the process required to reverse engineer an assembly generated by Protector?

View solution

Q. What is the typical limitation of any code encryption technique?

View solution

Q. Why is obfuscation considered to be a stronger protection method than encryption?

View solution

Q. What is the major weakness of encrypting IL code in assemblies?

View solution

Q. What is the best way to prevent people from reverse engineering .NET assemblies?

View solution

Q. What is the encryption algorithm used by Protector to encrypt the IL code?

View solution

Q. What hashing algorithm is used by Protector to create the key for encrypting the IL code?

View solution

Q. Is the encrypted IL code 100 percent platform-independent?

View solution

Q. What is the role of the native redistributable DLL included in Protector's encrypted assemblies?

View solution

Q. What is the alternative option offered by Protector for those not willing to sacrifice portability for security?

View solution

Q. Can precompiling your assemblies protect a tiny method that contains your precious algorithm?

View solution

Q. Is it difficult to reverse engineer native code?

View solution

Q. What is the potential vulnerability of precompiled assemblies?

View solution

Q. Why is native code less readable than IL code?

View solution

Q. What is the best way to prevent reverse engineering of .NET assemblies?

View solution

Q. What is the difference between the platform-dependent mode and the platform-independent mode in the Remotesoft Protector?

View solution

Q. What is the purpose of using a Linker component in the Remotesoft Obfuscator?

View solution