adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Why should you always obfuscate a program before passing it through an encryption-based packer like Remotesoft Protector?

a.

To make it easier for attackers to retrieve the original IL code

b.

To ensure that the decryption key is properly stored

c.

To prevent attackers from being able to obtain an accurate approximation of the program's source code

d.

None of the above

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (c).To prevent attackers from being able to obtain an accurate approximation of the program's source code Explanation:You want to make sure that code is properly obfuscated. Otherwise, it will be exceedingly easy to recover an accurate approximation of your program’s source code simply by decrypting the assembly.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Why should you always obfuscate a program before passing it through an encryption-based packer like Remotesoft Protector?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. Why is the decryption process of an assembly generated by Protector quite simple?

Q. What is the process required to reverse engineer an assembly generated by Protector?

Q. What is the typical limitation of any code encryption technique?

Q. Why is obfuscation considered to be a stronger protection method than encryption?

Q. What is the major weakness of encrypting IL code in assemblies?

Q. What is the best way to prevent people from reverse engineering .NET assemblies?

Q. What is the encryption algorithm used by Protector to encrypt the IL code?

Q. What hashing algorithm is used by Protector to create the key for encrypting the IL code?

Q. Is the encrypted IL code 100 percent platform-independent?

Q. What is the role of the native redistributable DLL included in Protector's encrypted assemblies?

Q. What is the alternative option offered by Protector for those not willing to sacrifice portability for security?

Q. Can precompiling your assemblies protect a tiny method that contains your precious algorithm?

Q. Is it difficult to reverse engineer native code?

Q. What is the potential vulnerability of precompiled assemblies?

Q. Why is native code less readable than IL code?

Q. What is the best way to prevent reverse engineering of .NET assemblies?

Q. What is the difference between the platform-dependent mode and the platform-independent mode in the Remotesoft Protector?

Q. What is the purpose of using a Linker component in the Remotesoft Obfuscator?

Q. What is the Remotesoft Obfuscator and what is the difference between it and other obfuscators?

Q. What problem do System calls pose in .NET executables?