adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Which statement best describes the compatibility of the two dialog description approaches?

a.

The two approaches are fundamentally incompatible and cannot be combined.

b.

Both approaches can be combined to form a single unified notation.

c.

While the approaches differ, it is possible to extract parts of one approach and analyze them together.

d.

The centralized approach can only be used with syntax-heavy dialog descriptions.

Answer: (c).While the approaches differ, it is possible to extract parts of one approach and analyze them together. Explanation:The two dialog description approaches are not fundamentally incompatible. It is possible to extract parts of one approach and analyze them together, regardless of whether the overall approach is centralized or distributed. For example, one could extract input clauses from a distributed notation for focused analysis.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Which statement best describes the compatibility of the two dialog description approaches?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. Which of the following describes a situation where extracting the dialog structure is challenging?

Q. In the context of dialog descriptions, what can complicate the separation of syntactic and semantic elements?

Q. Which programming construct is used to manage different interaction scenarios in the provided C code snippet?

Q. In the context of dialog descriptions, what does the term "database normalization procedures" refer to?

Q. What is the primary focus of the first heading "Action properties" in dialog analysis?

Q. In the context of dialog analysis, what is the significance of looking for "forgotten events"?

Q. Why is it important to anticipate and analyze odd chains of events in dialog descriptions?

Q. Why might it be challenging to perform an analysis of a production rule system for dialog behavior?

Q. What is the primary purpose of deciding that unspecified behavior will have no effect (except possibly a warning) in dialog design?

Q. In the context of dialog description, what is non-determinism?

Q. What can cause non-determinism in dialog descriptions?

Q. Why is consistency an important property to consider in dialog design?

Q. Why is it not possible to automate checks for consistency in a dialog description?

Q. What does the property of "reachability" in dialog design refer to?

Q. What is the primary concern when checking if a dialog is fully connected?

Q. In dialog design, what can destroy the connectivity of a dialog?

Q. Why is it important to distinguish between user-controlled and system-controlled choices when conducting reachability checking?

Q. What is the term used to describe the ability for a user to return to the previous state in a dialog?

Q. In the context of dialog design, why is dialog-level reversibility not equivalent to a true undo mechanism?

Q. What is the purpose of labeling certain states as "dangerous" in a dialog?