adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What is the primary purpose of deciding that unspecified behavior will have no effect (except possibly a warning) in dialog design?

a.

To encourage designers to be cautious about adding too many actions

b.

To provide a consistent and deterministic behavior in the user interface

c.

To simplify the dialog description and reduce complexity

d.

To accommodate unforeseen user actions and interactions

Answer: (b).To provide a consistent and deterministic behavior in the user interface Explanation:The primary purpose of deciding that unspecified behavior will have no effect (except possibly a warning) is to provide a consistent and deterministic behavior in the user interface. This approach ensures that users are not surprised by unexpected outcomes and that the system behaves predictably.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What is the primary purpose of deciding that unspecified behavior will have no effect (except possibly a warning) in dialog design?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. In the context of dialog description, what is non-determinism?

Q. What can cause non-determinism in dialog descriptions?

Q. Why is consistency an important property to consider in dialog design?

Q. Why is it not possible to automate checks for consistency in a dialog description?

Q. What does the property of "reachability" in dialog design refer to?

Q. What is the primary concern when checking if a dialog is fully connected?

Q. In dialog design, what can destroy the connectivity of a dialog?

Q. Why is it important to distinguish between user-controlled and system-controlled choices when conducting reachability checking?

Q. What is the term used to describe the ability for a user to return to the previous state in a dialog?

Q. In the context of dialog design, why is dialog-level reversibility not equivalent to a true undo mechanism?

Q. What is the purpose of labeling certain states as "dangerous" in a dialog?

Q. How can designers prevent users from accidentally reaching dangerous states in a dialog?

Q. What is the main argument against designing dialog actions with detailed key bindings?

Q. What is one of the purposes of visually distinct modes in dialog design?

Q. Why is it inadvisable to mingle different interface styles, such as verb-object and object-verb syntax?

Q. What is a potential constraint on dialog design based on physical limitations?

Q. Which of the following properties of a dialog involves analyzing whether similar actions in different circumstances yield similar results?

Q. What is the main purpose of checking the reachability of dialog states in a system?

Q. Which type of dialog style is often associated with object-verb syntax and menu-based systems?

Q. What can be considered a potential drawback of using a dialog description that involves detailed key bindings?