Q. Why is it not possible to automate checks for consistency in a dialog description?

View solution

Q. What does the property of "reachability" in dialog design refer to?

View solution

Q. What is the primary concern when checking if a dialog is fully connected?

View solution

Q. In dialog design, what can destroy the connectivity of a dialog?

View solution

Q. Why is it important to distinguish between user-controlled and system-controlled choices when conducting reachability checking?

View solution

Q. What is the term used to describe the ability for a user to return to the previous state in a dialog?

View solution

Q. In the context of dialog design, why is dialog-level reversibility not equivalent to a true undo mechanism?

View solution

Q. What is the purpose of labeling certain states as "dangerous" in a dialog?

View solution

Q. How can designers prevent users from accidentally reaching dangerous states in a dialog?

View solution

Q. What is the main argument against designing dialog actions with detailed key bindings?

View solution

Q. What is one of the purposes of visually distinct modes in dialog design?

View solution

Q. Why is it inadvisable to mingle different interface styles, such as verb-object and object-verb syntax?

View solution

Q. What is a potential constraint on dialog design based on physical limitations?

View solution

Q. Which of the following properties of a dialog involves analyzing whether similar actions in different circumstances yield similar results?

View solution

Q. What is the main purpose of checking the reachability of dialog states in a system?

View solution

Q. Which type of dialog style is often associated with object-verb syntax and menu-based systems?

View solution

Q. What can be considered a potential drawback of using a dialog description that involves detailed key bindings?

View solution

Q. Why should dangerous states in a dialog be deliberately difficult to reach?

View solution