adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

How do participants frame their utterances in a conversation based on their knowledge of their partner's understanding?

a.

They make their utterances as concise as possible.

b.

They use complex vocabulary to challenge their partner's understanding.

c.

They make their utterances relevant and helpful.

d.

They intentionally create ambiguity to stimulate discussion.

Answer: (c).They make their utterances relevant and helpful. Explanation:Participants frame their utterances in a conversation to be relevant and helpful, considering their partner's understanding. This helps ensure that the conversation remains coherent and that the listener can comprehend and respond appropriately.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. How do participants frame their utterances in a conversation based on their knowledge of their partner's understanding?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is a key developmental step for a child in terms of their understanding of viewpoints?

Q. How does conversation rely on continuous interaction?

Q. What is the basic premise of speech act theory?

Q. Which term refers to the basic acts in speech act theory that involve promises and requests?

Q. What effect do some speech acts have on a conversation?

Q. What does a conversation for action (CfA) represent in speech act theory?

Q. In what circumstances can a silence or unspoken action function as a speech act?

Q. What is the main idea behind a "conversation for possibilities"?

Q. What is the role of meta-conversation in a conversation?

Q. What is one of the criticisms of speech act theory?

Q. What is one argument in favor of making illocutionary acts explicit in electronic communication?

Q. What is the major form of direct communication in asynchronous groupware?

Q. How does text-based communication in groupware systems compare to face-to-face communication?

Q. How is a linear transcript different from a structured message system like "Coordinator"?

Q. What is one of the most significant differences between face-to-face and text-based communication?

Q. How do email users compensate for the absence of tone of voice and body language in their messages?

Q. What do emoticons and acronyms like "LOL" serve to do in text-based communication?

Q. How does the use of language in email differ from face-to-face conversation?

Q. What is a consequence of the absence of interruptions and the more measured pace of interaction in text-based communication?

Q. What are the grounding constraints that Clark and Brennan describe in text-based communication?