adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What is one argument in favor of making illocutionary acts explicit in electronic communication?

a.

It guarantees accurate interpretation of implicit communication

b.

It eliminates the need for users to engage in meta-conversations

c.

It helps expert communicators improve their communication skills

d.

It reduces the challenge of using a blank screen for communication

Answer: (c).It helps expert communicators improve their communication skills Explanation:Teaching managers to recognize their speech acts could improve their communication skills, implying that explicit representation of illocutionary acts could be a good tool for training communication skills.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What is one argument in favor of making illocutionary acts explicit in electronic communication?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the major form of direct communication in asynchronous groupware?

Q. How does text-based communication in groupware systems compare to face-to-face communication?

Q. How is a linear transcript different from a structured message system like "Coordinator"?

Q. What is one of the most significant differences between face-to-face and text-based communication?

Q. How do email users compensate for the absence of tone of voice and body language in their messages?

Q. What do emoticons and acronyms like "LOL" serve to do in text-based communication?

Q. How does the use of language in email differ from face-to-face conversation?

Q. What is a consequence of the absence of interruptions and the more measured pace of interaction in text-based communication?

Q. What are the grounding constraints that Clark and Brennan describe in text-based communication?

Q. What effect does simultaneity in face-to-face conversation have on communication?

Q. Why is the concept of sequence in linear transcripts complicated in text-based communication?

Q. How does the lack of grounding constraints affect the process of obtaining common ground in text-based communication?

Q. What is a notable difference in the effectiveness of resolving conflicts between text-based meetings and face-to-face meetings?

Q. In text-based conversation, why are breakdowns in turn-taking more rare than in letter writing?

Q. How does the complexity of turn-taking change when there are three or more participants in a text-based conversation?

Q. How is turn-taking resolved in face-to-face groups with three or more participants?

Q. What role do back channels play in facilitating turn-taking in conversations?

Q. What are some mechanisms used to manage turn-taking in text-based conversations with three or more participants?

Q. In text-based communication, why is it difficult to use external context to disambiguate utterances?

Q. What is the purpose of maintaining "WYSIWIS" in groupware systems?