adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

How does conversation rely on continuous interaction?

a.

Continuous interaction ensures that conversations are always long and detailed.

b.

Continuous interaction reduces the need for grounding.

c.

Continuous interaction confirms understanding and corrects misinterpretations.

d.

Continuous interaction leads to the creation of a static shared understanding.

Answer: (c).Continuous interaction confirms understanding and corrects misinterpretations. Explanation:Conversation relies on continuous interaction because it allows participants to confirm understanding and correct misinterpretations. Through ongoing interaction, participants can address any ambiguities or misunderstandings that arise and maintain a coherent flow of communication.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. How does conversation rely on continuous interaction?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the basic premise of speech act theory?

Q. Which term refers to the basic acts in speech act theory that involve promises and requests?

Q. What effect do some speech acts have on a conversation?

Q. What does a conversation for action (CfA) represent in speech act theory?

Q. In what circumstances can a silence or unspoken action function as a speech act?

Q. What is the main idea behind a "conversation for possibilities"?

Q. What is the role of meta-conversation in a conversation?

Q. What is one of the criticisms of speech act theory?

Q. What is one argument in favor of making illocutionary acts explicit in electronic communication?

Q. What is the major form of direct communication in asynchronous groupware?

Q. How does text-based communication in groupware systems compare to face-to-face communication?

Q. How is a linear transcript different from a structured message system like "Coordinator"?

Q. What is one of the most significant differences between face-to-face and text-based communication?

Q. How do email users compensate for the absence of tone of voice and body language in their messages?

Q. What do emoticons and acronyms like "LOL" serve to do in text-based communication?

Q. How does the use of language in email differ from face-to-face conversation?

Q. What is a consequence of the absence of interruptions and the more measured pace of interaction in text-based communication?

Q. What are the grounding constraints that Clark and Brennan describe in text-based communication?

Q. What effect does simultaneity in face-to-face conversation have on communication?

Q. Why is the concept of sequence in linear transcripts complicated in text-based communication?