adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

In what circumstances can a silence or unspoken action function as a speech act?

a.

Only when it is accompanied by verbal clarification

b.

When it is explicitly labeled by the participants

c.

When it is intended to express emotions

d.

When it is interpreted as having meaning by participants

Answer: (d).When it is interpreted as having meaning by participants Explanation:In speech act theory, not all speech acts need to be spoken words. Silence or unspoken actions can also function as speech acts, conveying meaning to participants in the conversation. These acts are interpreted based on the context and the intentions of the participants. For example, if someone remains silent after a proposal, it might be interpreted as a refusal or hesitation depending on the situation.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. In what circumstances can a silence or unspoken action function as a speech act?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the main idea behind a "conversation for possibilities"?

Q. What is the role of meta-conversation in a conversation?

Q. What is one of the criticisms of speech act theory?

Q. What is one argument in favor of making illocutionary acts explicit in electronic communication?

Q. What is the major form of direct communication in asynchronous groupware?

Q. How does text-based communication in groupware systems compare to face-to-face communication?

Q. How is a linear transcript different from a structured message system like "Coordinator"?

Q. What is one of the most significant differences between face-to-face and text-based communication?

Q. How do email users compensate for the absence of tone of voice and body language in their messages?

Q. What do emoticons and acronyms like "LOL" serve to do in text-based communication?

Q. How does the use of language in email differ from face-to-face conversation?

Q. What is a consequence of the absence of interruptions and the more measured pace of interaction in text-based communication?

Q. What are the grounding constraints that Clark and Brennan describe in text-based communication?

Q. What effect does simultaneity in face-to-face conversation have on communication?

Q. Why is the concept of sequence in linear transcripts complicated in text-based communication?

Q. How does the lack of grounding constraints affect the process of obtaining common ground in text-based communication?

Q. What is a notable difference in the effectiveness of resolving conflicts between text-based meetings and face-to-face meetings?

Q. In text-based conversation, why are breakdowns in turn-taking more rare than in letter writing?

Q. How does the complexity of turn-taking change when there are three or more participants in a text-based conversation?

Q. How is turn-taking resolved in face-to-face groups with three or more participants?