Welcome to the Exploiting Network Vulnerabilities MCQs Page

Dive deep into the fascinating world of Exploiting Network Vulnerabilities with our comprehensive set of Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs). This page is dedicated to exploring the fundamental concepts and intricacies of Exploiting Network Vulnerabilities, a crucial aspect of CompTIA PenTest+ Certification Exam PT0 002. In this section, you will encounter a diverse range of MCQs that cover various aspects of Exploiting Network Vulnerabilities, from the basic principles to advanced topics. Each question is thoughtfully crafted to challenge your knowledge and deepen your understanding of this critical subcategory within CompTIA PenTest+ Certification Exam PT0 002.

Check out the MCQs below to embark on an enriching journey through Exploiting Network Vulnerabilities. Test your knowledge, expand your horizons, and solidify your grasp on this vital area of CompTIA PenTest+ Certification Exam PT0 002.

Note: Each MCQ comes with multiple answer choices. Select the most appropriate option and test your understanding of Exploiting Network Vulnerabilities. You can click on an option to test your knowledge before viewing the solution for a MCQ. Happy learning!

Exploiting Network Vulnerabilities MCQs | Page 9 of 13

Explore more Topics under CompTIA PenTest+ Certification Exam PT0 002

01

Penetration Testing

02

Planning and Scoping Penetration Tests 🔒

03

Information Gathering 🔒

04

Vulnerability Scanning 🔒

05

Analyzing Vulnerability Scans

06

Exploiting and Pivoting 🔒

07

Exploiting Physical and Social Vulnerabilities

08

Exploiting Application Vulnerabilities 🔒

09

Attacking Hosts,Cloud Technologies and Specialized Systems 🔒

10

Reporting and Communication

11

Scripting for Penetration Testing 🔒

Q81.

How can penetration testers use Aircrack-ng to perform Evil Twin attacks?

Use Aircrack-ng to brute force Wi-Fi passwords

Clone legitimate access points using airbase-ng

Conduct deauthentication attacks using Aircrack-ng

Create secure Wi-Fi networks for penetration testing

Discuss

Answer: (b).Clone legitimate access points using airbase-ng Explanation:Penetration testers can use Aircrack-ng to perform Evil Twin attacks by cloning legitimate access points using the airbase-ng tool.

Q82.

What is the purpose of conducting deauthentication attacks in Evil Twin scenarios?

To create secure connections between clients and access points

To ensure that the fake access point is more powerful than the legitimate one

To trick clients into reconnecting to the fake access point

To downgrade encryption schemes on the target network

Discuss

Answer: (c).To trick clients into reconnecting to the fake access point Explanation:Deauthentication attacks in Evil Twin scenarios involve sending deauthentication packets to the access point, tricking clients into reconnecting to the fake access point.

Q83.

How does EAPHammer differ from Aircrack-ng in conducting Evil Twin attacks?

EAPHammer focuses on brute force Wi-Fi password attacks

EAPHammer is designed for WPA2 Personal mode networks

Aircrack-ng is mostly automated and performs captive portal attacks

Aircrack-ng can conduct automated attacks against pre-shared key environments

Discuss

Answer: (c).Aircrack-ng is mostly automated and performs captive portal attacks Explanation:Aircrack-ng is mostly automated and can perform Evil Twin attacks, including captive portal attacks, whereas EAPHammer is designed specifically for WPA2 Enterprise mode networks.

Q84.

How is an Evil Twin different from a rogue access point?

An Evil Twin is any access point on a network, while a rogue access point is a malicious device.

A rogue access point is a secure access point, while an Evil Twin is a fake access point.

An Evil Twin is a specialized penetration testing device, while a rogue access point is any unauthorized access point.

A rogue access point is always configured as an Evil Twin.

Discuss

Answer: (c).An Evil Twin is a specialized penetration testing device, while a rogue access point is any unauthorized access point. Explanation:An Evil Twin is not necessarily the same as a rogue access point. A rogue access point is any unauthorized access point, while an Evil Twin is a specialized penetration testing device or a fake access point.

Q85.

What can penetration testers focus on after successfully conducting an on-path attack with an Evil Twin?

Creating secure connections for clients and access points

Conducting jamming attacks to prevent traffic flow

Working on credential harvesting by capturing unencrypted traffic

Downgrading encryption schemes on the target network

Discuss

Answer: (c).Working on credential harvesting by capturing unencrypted traffic Explanation:After successfully conducting an on-path attack with an Evil Twin, penetration testers can focus on credential harvesting by capturing unencrypted traffic between clients and remote systems.

Q86.

What security issue is associated with Wi-Fi Protected Setup (WPS)?

WPS uses a highly secure method for PIN validation

WPS passwords are immune to brute-force attacks

WPS PINs are easily cracked due to an insecure validation method

WPS provides strong encryption for network connections

Discuss

Answer: (c).WPS PINs are easily cracked due to an insecure validation method Explanation:WPS passwords can be attacked, particularly in the 8-digit PIN setup mode, as WPS uses an insecure method of validating PINs, making them susceptible to brute-force attacks.

Q87.

What is a pixie dust attack in the context of WPS vulnerabilities?

An attack that exploits Bluetooth-enabled devices

An attack that targets poorly encrypted PINs for access points

A method of conducting offline brute-force attacks against WPS passwords

A type of attack that leverages poor selection algorithms in routers

Discuss

Answer: (b).An attack that targets poorly encrypted PINs for access points Explanation:A pixie dust attack focuses on poorly encrypted PINs for access points, allowing offline brute-force attacks against them.

Q88.

How does Reaver function in exploiting WPS vulnerabilities?

Reaver relies on the WPS setup button to brute-force PINs

Reaver brute-forces the WPS setup PIN without relying on the setup button

Reaver requires physical access to the router for exploitation

Reaver attempts brute-force attacks on Bluetooth-enabled devices

Discuss

Answer: (b).Reaver brute-forces the WPS setup PIN without relying on the setup button Explanation:Reaver can function even if the WPS setup button hasn’t been used on the router or access point, as it brute-forces the WPS setup PIN directly.

Q89.

What is the maximum number of possible PINs that Reaver needs to brute-force in most cases?

10,000

11,000

12,000

15,000

Discuss

Answer: (b).11,000 Explanation:Reaver typically needs to brute-force 11,000 possible PINs at the most due to the WPS protocol's implementation.

Q90.

What is the Bluetooth attack method that involves the theft of information from Bluetooth-enabled devices?

Bluejacking

Bluebugging

Bluesnarfing

Bluetooth Spoofing

Discuss

Answer: (c).Bluesnarfing Explanation:Bluesnarfing is the theft of information from Bluetooth-enabled devices, and it involves stealing data such as phonebook contacts via Bluetooth.

Page 9 of 13

Planning and Scoping Penetration Tests 🔒

Information Gathering 🔒

Vulnerability Scanning 🔒

Exploiting and Pivoting 🔒

Exploiting Application Vulnerabilities 🔒

Attacking Hosts,Cloud Technologies and Specialized Systems 🔒

Scripting for Penetration Testing 🔒

Welcome to the Exploiting Network Vulnerabilities MCQs Page

Exploiting Network Vulnerabilities MCQs | Page 9 of 13

Explore more Topics under CompTIA PenTest+ Certification Exam PT0 002

Penetration Testing

Analyzing Vulnerability Scans

Exploiting Physical and Social Vulnerabilities

Reporting and Communication

Suggested Topics

Neural Networks

Compiler Design

UNIX

C Programming

Human Computer Interaction

Computer Hardware

Software Architecture and Design

Cryptography and Network Security

HTML