adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

How does EAPHammer differ from Aircrack-ng in conducting Evil Twin attacks?

a.

EAPHammer focuses on brute force Wi-Fi password attacks

b.

EAPHammer is designed for WPA2 Personal mode networks

c.

Aircrack-ng is mostly automated and performs captive portal attacks

d.

Aircrack-ng can conduct automated attacks against pre-shared key environments

Answer: (c).Aircrack-ng is mostly automated and performs captive portal attacks Explanation:Aircrack-ng is mostly automated and can perform Evil Twin attacks, including captive portal attacks, whereas EAPHammer is designed specifically for WPA2 Enterprise mode networks.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. How does EAPHammer differ from Aircrack-ng in conducting Evil Twin attacks?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. How is an Evil Twin different from a rogue access point?

Q. What can penetration testers focus on after successfully conducting an on-path attack with an Evil Twin?

Q. What security issue is associated with Wi-Fi Protected Setup (WPS)?

Q. What is a pixie dust attack in the context of WPS vulnerabilities?

Q. How does Reaver function in exploiting WPS vulnerabilities?

Q. What is the maximum number of possible PINs that Reaver needs to brute-force in most cases?

Q. What is the Bluetooth attack method that involves the theft of information from Bluetooth-enabled devices?

Q. What is the primary concern with Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) attacks?

Q. What is NFC commonly used for in day-to-day life?

Q. How do amplification attacks in the context of NFC work?

Q. Which tool is specifically designed for exploiting 802.11 protocol weaknesses and flaws?

Q. What capability does WiFite2 include for auditing wireless networks?

Q. What is Kismet primarily designed for?

Q. What type of attack is Fern primarily known for?

Q. Which type of RFID cards can be cloned using readily available cloning tools?

Q. What technology makes it possible to clone high-frequency 13.56 MHz RFID cards with phones?

Q. In what situation might wireless DoS be a legitimate technique for penetration testers?

Q. How can repeating traffic or conducting a relay attack be useful for a penetration tester?

Q. What may be required to gain access to a wired network in an on-site penetration test?

Q. What technique can be useful for a penetration tester to gain network access in a wireless network?