adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Why is it important to explicitly state the behavior of components in operations within formal specifications?

a.

To make the specification more concise and readable

b.

To eliminate unnecessary details from the specification

c.

To ensure that the operation matches the intended behavior

d.

To improve the visual appeal of the specification

Answer: (c).To ensure that the operation matches the intended behavior Explanation:Explicitly stating the behavior of components in operations is important to ensure that the operation matches the intended behavior and to avoid potential misunderstandings.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Why is it important to explicitly state the behavior of components in operations within formal specifications?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What does the separation between system functionality and presentation mean in the context of formal specifications?

Q. Why might adding presentation-related information to a formal specification complicate it?

Q. What is one limitation of the model-oriented approach when dealing with separation between system functionality and presentation?

Q. What is the main focus of algebraic notations in the context of interface specification?

Q. How does an algebraic specification differ from a model-oriented specification like Z?

Q. What is the purpose of the axioms in an algebraic specification?

Q. What is the significance of the forgetful behavior of the move operation in the algebraic specification?

Q. Which statement accurately describes the relationship between algebraic specifications and system behavior?

Q. In algebraic notation, why does the expression read from the inside out?

Q. What is the advantage of using an algebraic notation with an implicit state?

Q. What is the significance of completeness in the context of axioms?

Q. What limitation is highlighted by the absence of observation operators in the provided algebraic specification?

Q. What solution is proposed to address the lack of observation in the algebraic specification?

Q. Which logical operators are used in temporal logic to reason about time?

Q. What does the statement p! (computer explodes) mean in temporal logic?

Q. How are temporal logic operators useful in specifying properties of interactive systems?

Q. Which logical formula represents the statement "It always rains on Tuesday" in temporal logic?

Q. What is the key advantage of using temporal logic in specifying interactive systems?

Q. What additional temporal operators are introduced in temporal logic to reason about time intervals?

Q. In the context of temporal logic, what does "p before q" mean?