adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What is the significance of completeness in the context of axioms?

a.

It ensures that all possible system states are accounted for in the specification.

b.

It guarantees that the specification is easy to understand and follow.

c.

It refers to the clarity of the axioms in relation to the system behavior.

d.

It indicates that the axioms are properly formatted and organized.

Answer: (a).It ensures that all possible system states are accounted for in the specification. Explanation:Completeness in the context of axioms ensures that all possible system states and behaviors are accounted for in the specification.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What is the significance of completeness in the context of axioms?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What limitation is highlighted by the absence of observation operators in the provided algebraic specification?

Q. What solution is proposed to address the lack of observation in the algebraic specification?

Q. Which logical operators are used in temporal logic to reason about time?

Q. What does the statement p! (computer explodes) mean in temporal logic?

Q. How are temporal logic operators useful in specifying properties of interactive systems?

Q. Which logical formula represents the statement "It always rains on Tuesday" in temporal logic?

Q. What is the key advantage of using temporal logic in specifying interactive systems?

Q. What additional temporal operators are introduced in temporal logic to reason about time intervals?

Q. In the context of temporal logic, what does "p before q" mean?

Q. What aspect of real-time behavior does temporal logic not represent?

Q. Why might real-time notations be challenging to use for human-computer interaction (HCI) design?

Q. What do traditional specifications focus on when describing system behavior?

Q. What concept does deontic logic include to address issues related to responsibilities and obligations?

Q. What are the most common deontic operators used in deontic logic?

Q. How can the concept of actions be integrated into deontic specifications?

Q. Why is it important for interface designers to consider responsibilities and obligations in their designs?

Q. What does the PIE model specifically target?

Q. What is the primary value of using interaction models?

Q. What is a key aspect of the informal principles derived from formal analyses?

Q. What is the primary focus of the PIE model?