adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What additional temporal operators are introduced in temporal logic to reason about time intervals?

a.

p (always) and , (eventually)

b.

p until q and p before q

c.

¬ (negation) and ∧ (conjunction)

d.

∃ (existential quantification) and ∀ (universal quantification)

Answer: (b).p until q and p before q Explanation:Additional temporal operators introduced in temporal logic to reason about time intervals are p until q (p must remain true until q becomes true) and p before q (p must be true at some time before q becomes true).

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What additional temporal operators are introduced in temporal logic to reason about time intervals?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. In the context of temporal logic, what does "p before q" mean?

Q. What aspect of real-time behavior does temporal logic not represent?

Q. Why might real-time notations be challenging to use for human-computer interaction (HCI) design?

Q. What do traditional specifications focus on when describing system behavior?

Q. What concept does deontic logic include to address issues related to responsibilities and obligations?

Q. What are the most common deontic operators used in deontic logic?

Q. How can the concept of actions be integrated into deontic specifications?

Q. Why is it important for interface designers to consider responsibilities and obligations in their designs?

Q. What does the PIE model specifically target?

Q. What is the primary value of using interaction models?

Q. What is a key aspect of the informal principles derived from formal analyses?

Q. What is the primary focus of the PIE model?

Q. In the PIE model, what is the role of the "effect" (E)?

Q. What is the purpose of the state transition function "doit" in the PIE model?

Q. Which statement describes the relationship between the interpretation function "I" and the state transition function "doit"?

Q. At what levels of abstraction can the PIE model be applied?

Q. What does WYSIWYG stand for?

Q. How many interpretations of WYSIWYG does Harold Thimbleby mention?

Q. What is the property of "result transparency" in the context of observability?

Q. What is the key difference between "result transparency" and "transparency"?