adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Why should dangerous states in a dialog be deliberately difficult to reach?

a.

To discourage users from interacting with the system

b.

To minimize the use of modes in the dialog

c.

To prevent accidental or undesirable interactions

d.

To encourage users to explore different options

Answer: (c).To prevent accidental or undesirable interactions Explanation:Dangerous states in a dialog should be deliberately difficult to reach in order to prevent accidental or undesirable interactions. Designers should ensure that critical or irreversible actions are not easily accessible to avoid unintended consequences.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Why should dangerous states in a dialog be deliberately difficult to reach?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What can be considered a potential drawback of using a dialog description that involves detailed key bindings?

Q. Which type of dialog style is often associated with object-verb syntax and menu-based systems?

Q. What is the main purpose of checking the reachability of dialog states in a system?

Q. Which of the following properties of a dialog involves analyzing whether similar actions in different circumstances yield similar results?

Q. What is a potential constraint on dialog design based on physical limitations?

Q. Why is it inadvisable to mingle different interface styles, such as verb-object and object-verb syntax?

Q. What is one of the purposes of visually distinct modes in dialog design?

Q. What is the main argument against designing dialog actions with detailed key bindings?

Q. How can designers prevent users from accidentally reaching dangerous states in a dialog?

Q. What is the purpose of labeling certain states as "dangerous" in a dialog?

Q. In the context of dialog design, why is dialog-level reversibility not equivalent to a true undo mechanism?

Q. What is the term used to describe the ability for a user to return to the previous state in a dialog?

Q. Why is it important to distinguish between user-controlled and system-controlled choices when conducting reachability checking?

Q. In dialog design, what can destroy the connectivity of a dialog?

Q. What is the primary concern when checking if a dialog is fully connected?

Q. What does the property of "reachability" in dialog design refer to?

Q. Why is it not possible to automate checks for consistency in a dialog description?

Q. Why is consistency an important property to consider in dialog design?

Q. What can cause non-determinism in dialog descriptions?

Q. In the context of dialog description, what is non-determinism?