adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

How can a domain expert's input be valuable in refining a task hierarchy?

a.

By identifying expert knowledge implicit in the task hierarchy

b.

By introducing complex motor responses to the hierarchy

c.

By suggesting new subtasks for expansion

d.

By analyzing internal decision-making processes

Answer: (a).By identifying expert knowledge implicit in the task hierarchy Explanation:A domain expert's input can be valuable in refining a task hierarchy by identifying expert knowledge implicit in the hierarchy, as well as pointing out omissions or errors in the task decomposition.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. How can a domain expert's input be valuable in refining a task hierarchy?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. Which term describes the situation where tasks can be performed concurrently or intermingled?

Q. What is the primary goal of building taxonomies in knowledge-based task analysis?

Q. What is a key advantage of using sorting tasks in forming taxonomies?

Q. In the context of taxonomies, why might the classification of objects change based on the intended purpose of the task analysis?

Q. Why is it important to list everything you can when forming a taxonomy?

Q. How can a knowledge-based taxonomy be adjusted based on user needs?

Q. What is the purpose of using taxonomies in knowledge-based task analysis?

Q. In the context of taxonomy formation, what are AND branches used for?

Q. Why is it important for a taxonomy to satisfy the uniqueness rule in techniques like TAKD?

Q. What role does the knowledge representation grammar (KRG) play in the taxonomy structure?

Q. Why might it be important to refine a taxonomy to satisfy the uniqueness rule, even if other techniques cope without it?

Q. In the context of taxonomy formation, what is the purpose of the uniqueness rule?

Q. How does the taxonomy of actions differ from the hierarchy in HTA?

Q. What is the purpose of cross-checking between object and action taxonomies?

Q. How is a sentence in KRG defined in TAKD?

Q. What is a possible advantage of using object and action taxonomies in task analysis?

Q. What is generification in the context of knowledge-based task analysis?

Q. How does the number of different KRG sentences impact the choice of generification level?

Q. What is the purpose of looking at generic task sequences in knowledge-based task analysis?

Q. How can generification be beneficial in teaching purposes?