adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

In the context of taxonomies, why might the classification of objects change based on the intended purpose of the task analysis?

a.

Different users have different preferences for object categorization.

b.

The structure of taxonomies remains constant across all purposes.

c.

Taxonomies reflect the physical arrangement of objects.

d.

Different purposes require different perspectives on object relationships.

Answer: (d).Different purposes require different perspectives on object relationships. Explanation:The classification of objects might change based on the intended purpose of the task analysis because different purposes require different perspectives on object relationships. The structure of taxonomies can vary depending on the specific goals and applications of the analysis.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. In the context of taxonomies, why might the classification of objects change based on the intended purpose of the task analysis?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. Why is it important to list everything you can when forming a taxonomy?

Q. How can a knowledge-based taxonomy be adjusted based on user needs?

Q. What is the purpose of using taxonomies in knowledge-based task analysis?

Q. In the context of taxonomy formation, what are AND branches used for?

Q. Why is it important for a taxonomy to satisfy the uniqueness rule in techniques like TAKD?

Q. What role does the knowledge representation grammar (KRG) play in the taxonomy structure?

Q. Why might it be important to refine a taxonomy to satisfy the uniqueness rule, even if other techniques cope without it?

Q. In the context of taxonomy formation, what is the purpose of the uniqueness rule?

Q. How does the taxonomy of actions differ from the hierarchy in HTA?

Q. What is the purpose of cross-checking between object and action taxonomies?

Q. How is a sentence in KRG defined in TAKD?

Q. What is a possible advantage of using object and action taxonomies in task analysis?

Q. What is generification in the context of knowledge-based task analysis?

Q. How does the number of different KRG sentences impact the choice of generification level?

Q. What is the purpose of looking at generic task sequences in knowledge-based task analysis?

Q. How can generification be beneficial in teaching purposes?

Q. How does the matching of levels of detail between actions and objects affect the KRG sentences?

Q. In the context of entity–relationship-based task analysis, what is the primary focus of the analysis?

Q. What are the entities that entity–relationship modeling emphasizes in the context of task analysis?

Q. What is the key feature of entity–relationship-based task analysis?