adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Why might it be important to refine a taxonomy to satisfy the uniqueness rule, even if other techniques cope without it?

a.

The uniqueness rule ensures a more efficient taxonomy structure.

b.

The uniqueness rule is universally required for all taxonomy structures.

c.

The uniqueness rule prevents excessive expansion of the hierarchy.

d.

The uniqueness rule aids in precise differentiation of objects and classes.

Answer: (d).The uniqueness rule aids in precise differentiation of objects and classes. Explanation:Refining a taxonomy to satisfy the uniqueness rule is important because it aids in precise differentiation of objects and classes. This rule ensures that objects can be uniquely identified within the hierarchy, leading to clearer and more distinct classifications.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Why might it be important to refine a taxonomy to satisfy the uniqueness rule, even if other techniques cope without it?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. In the context of taxonomy formation, what is the purpose of the uniqueness rule?

Q. How does the taxonomy of actions differ from the hierarchy in HTA?

Q. What is the purpose of cross-checking between object and action taxonomies?

Q. How is a sentence in KRG defined in TAKD?

Q. What is a possible advantage of using object and action taxonomies in task analysis?

Q. What is generification in the context of knowledge-based task analysis?

Q. How does the number of different KRG sentences impact the choice of generification level?

Q. What is the purpose of looking at generic task sequences in knowledge-based task analysis?

Q. How can generification be beneficial in teaching purposes?

Q. How does the matching of levels of detail between actions and objects affect the KRG sentences?

Q. In the context of entity–relationship-based task analysis, what is the primary focus of the analysis?

Q. What are the entities that entity–relationship modeling emphasizes in the context of task analysis?

Q. What is the key feature of entity–relationship-based task analysis?

Q. How does entity–relationship-based task analysis differ from knowledge-based task analysis?

Q. In the context of entity–relationship-based task analysis, what are the three basic types of entities that can be classified?

Q. How are composite objects different from simple concrete objects?

Q. What is the distinction between human actors and non-human actors?

Q. What is the primary purpose of listing attributes for each object in entity–relationship-based task analysis?

Q. What is the primary purpose of analyzing the relationships between objects, actions, and events in entity–relationship-based task analysis?

Q. What distinguishes a composite object from a simple concrete object?