adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

How does the number of different KRG sentences impact the choice of generification level?

a.

More KRG sentences suggest that more generification is needed.

b.

Fewer KRG sentences suggest that more generification is needed.

c.

More KRG sentences suggest that the level of abstraction is appropriate.

d.

Fewer KRG sentences suggest that the level of abstraction is appropriate.

Answer: (a).More KRG sentences suggest that more generification is needed. Explanation:If there are an unmanageable number of different KRG sentences, it suggests that more generification is required to simplify and consolidate the taxonomy.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. How does the number of different KRG sentences impact the choice of generification level?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the purpose of looking at generic task sequences in knowledge-based task analysis?

Q. How can generification be beneficial in teaching purposes?

Q. How does the matching of levels of detail between actions and objects affect the KRG sentences?

Q. In the context of entity–relationship-based task analysis, what is the primary focus of the analysis?

Q. What are the entities that entity–relationship modeling emphasizes in the context of task analysis?

Q. What is the key feature of entity–relationship-based task analysis?

Q. How does entity–relationship-based task analysis differ from knowledge-based task analysis?

Q. In the context of entity–relationship-based task analysis, what are the three basic types of entities that can be classified?

Q. How are composite objects different from simple concrete objects?

Q. What is the distinction between human actors and non-human actors?

Q. What is the primary purpose of listing attributes for each object in entity–relationship-based task analysis?

Q. What is the primary purpose of analyzing the relationships between objects, actions, and events in entity–relationship-based task analysis?

Q. What distinguishes a composite object from a simple concrete object?

Q. What is the distinction between an action and an event in entity–relationship-based task analysis?

Q. Which type of event is timed and not associated with an agent or object?

Q. In the context of entity–relationship-based task analysis, what is an example of an action–event relationship?

Q. Which method is a way to represent action sequences in entity–relationship-based task analysis?

Q. What is the term used to describe a diagram that represents all the actions in which a specific object participates?

Q. How does identifying roles in entity–relationship-based task analysis contribute to understanding an organization?

Q. What is the primary purpose of analyzing relationships between objects, actions, and events in entity–relationship-based task analysis?