adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

How is turn-taking resolved in face-to-face groups with three or more participants?

a.

Participants wait for an explicit invitation to speak.

b.

The first participant who wants to speak gets the turn.

c.

The current speaker decides who should speak next.

d.

Participants take turns in a predetermined order.

Answer: (b).The first participant who wants to speak gets the turn. Explanation:In face-to-face groups with three or more participants, the turn is often taken by the first participant who wants to speak or speaks most strongly.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. How is turn-taking resolved in face-to-face groups with three or more participants?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What role do back channels play in facilitating turn-taking in conversations?

Q. What are some mechanisms used to manage turn-taking in text-based conversations with three or more participants?

Q. In text-based communication, why is it difficult to use external context to disambiguate utterances?

Q. What is the purpose of maintaining "WYSIWIS" in groupware systems?

Q. How do remote participants typically handle deictic reference in text-based communication?

Q. In the context of text-based communication, what is a potential issue with using group pointers for deictic reference?

Q. How does overlap in linear text transcripts impact contextual understanding?

Q. What is the key difference in pace between spoken conversation and text-based conversation?

Q. How does reducing the pace of a conversation impact its interactivity?

Q. What is the purpose of the coping strategy known as "multiplexing" in text-based communication?

Q. How does the strategy of "delegating parts of a task" affect communication in a cooperative work setting?

Q. In the context of the conversation tree, what does "going down several branches at once" represent?

Q. How does the coping strategy of "eagerness" work in text-based communication?

Q. What distinguishes the eagerness of letters in written communication compared to spoken communication?

Q. What is a potential problem of eagerness in communication?

Q. How does text-based communication overcome the problem of returning to a missed point in the conversation?

Q. What advantage does reviewability offer in text-based communication?

Q. How does hypertext address the potential problems of multiplexed messages in text-based communication?

Q. In asynchronous settings, what type of transcript is easier for a reader trying to catch up with a conversation?

Q. What challenge do co-authoring systems face regarding the concept of roles in joint authoring?