adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Can obfuscation prevent reverse engineering of .NET executables completely?

a.

Yes

b.

No

c.

May be Yes or No

d.

Can't say

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (b).No Explanation:Obfuscation can make reverse engineering of .NET executables more difficult, but it cannot prevent it completely.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Can obfuscation prevent reverse engineering of .NET executables completely?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. Why is obfuscation more common for .NET executables than for native executables?

Q. What is the purpose of obfuscating .NET executables?

Q. Why is renaming symbols a common strategy for obfuscating .NET executables?

Q. What is control flow obfuscation?

Q. What is one feature of popular obfuscators such as Dotfuscator and XenoCode?

Q. What is the vulnerability of .NET executables?

Q. What is the strategy for preventing decompilation in .NET executables?

Q. What is the purpose of renaming symbols in .NET executables?

Q. What is control flow obfuscation in .NET executables?

Q. What is the purpose of breaking decompilation and disassembly in .NET executables?

Q. What is the purpose of .NET obfuscators?

Q. What is the impact of obfuscators on the complexity of the reverse-engineering process?

Q. Which software metric approach only deals with the structural complexity of a program?

Q. Do most .NET obfuscators alter the structure or the representation of the program?

Q. What is the impact of control-flow obfuscation techniques on a program's control-flow graph?

Q. What is the purpose of breaking metadata entries when attempting to prevent disassembly of a .NET assembly?

Q. Is corrupting a .NET assembly's metadata a recommended approach for obfuscation?

Q. What is DotFuscator?

Q. What are the features of DotFuscator?

Q. What is Overload-Induction?