adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What makes reversing IL code easier than reversing native assembly language such as IA-32?

a.

There are fewer redundant details such as flags and registers

b.

There is more relevant information such as class definitions and accurate data type information

c.

Both a and b

d.

None of the above

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (c).Both a and b Explanation:Reversing IL code is easier than reversing native assembly language because there are fewer redundant details such as flags and registers, and more relevant information such as class definitions and accurate data type information.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What makes reversing IL code easier than reversing native assembly language such as IA-32?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. Why is it rarely necessary to read raw IL code?

Q. What is program comprehension?

Q. What is the benefit of using a decompiler such as Spices.Net?

Q. What is the vulnerability of .NET executables that makes obfuscation necessary?

Q. What is the common strategy for obfuscating .NET executables?

Q. Can obfuscation prevent reverse engineering of .NET executables completely?

Q. Why is obfuscation more common for .NET executables than for native executables?

Q. What is the purpose of obfuscating .NET executables?

Q. Why is renaming symbols a common strategy for obfuscating .NET executables?

Q. What is control flow obfuscation?

Q. What is one feature of popular obfuscators such as Dotfuscator and XenoCode?

Q. What is the vulnerability of .NET executables?

Q. What is the strategy for preventing decompilation in .NET executables?

Q. What is the purpose of renaming symbols in .NET executables?

Q. What is control flow obfuscation in .NET executables?

Q. What is the purpose of breaking decompilation and disassembly in .NET executables?

Q. What is the purpose of .NET obfuscators?

Q. What is the impact of obfuscators on the complexity of the reverse-engineering process?

Q. Which software metric approach only deals with the structural complexity of a program?

Q. Do most .NET obfuscators alter the structure or the representation of the program?