adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What is the disadvantage of the optimization chosen by the compiler for unwinding function parameters?

a.

It makes the code harder to read

b.

It makes the code slower

c.

It creates a buffer overflow vulnerability

d.

It causes stack alignment issues

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (a).It makes the code harder to read Explanation:This approach makes for a slightly less "reverser-friendly" function because every time the stack is accessed through ESP, you have to try to figure out where ESP is pointing to for each instruction.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What is the disadvantage of the optimization chosen by the compiler for unwinding function parameters?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. Why does the function end up using a bit more stack space?

Q. Which type of threads in Windows have a very limited stack space?

Q. What is the disadvantage of the function's stack unwinding approach from the program's perspective?

Q. Why is it important to ensure that the code that’s accessing a large block of stack space is properly aware of its size?

Q. What are intrinsic implementations?

Q. Why are string-manipulation routines historically a reason for vulnerabilities?

Q. What is the aim of using automatic, compiler-generated stack checking?

Q. How does automatic, compiler-generated stack checking work?

Q. What is the purpose of the cookie used in stack checking?

Q. Why does the cookie used in stack checking need to be a random number?

Q. How does the use of a pseudorandom number as a cookie prevent an attacker from fooling the cookie verification code?

Q. What is stack checking?

Q. How does stack checking work?

Q. Why must the cookie be a random number in stack checking?

Q. Can stack checking completely eliminate the problem of buffer overflow bugs?

Q. How can an attacker defeat stack checking?

Q. What is nonexecutable memory?

Q. Which processors provide support for nonexecutable memory?

Q. Which operating systems support nonexecutable memory?

Q. Does nonexecutable memory completely eliminate the problem of buffer overflow attacks?