adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Why does the function end up using a bit more stack space?

a.

Because the parameters from each of the function calls made during the function's lifetime stay in the stack for the remainder of the function.

b.

Because the stack space is generally not a problem in user-mode threads in Windows.

c.

Because the ESP references in the function access the same place multiple times.

d.

Because the function was defined with the cdecl calling convention.

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (a).Because the parameters from each of the function calls made during the function's lifetime stay in the stack for the remainder of the function. Explanation:The function ends up using a bit more stack space because the parameters from each of the function calls made during the function's lifetime stay in the stack for the remainder of the function.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Why does the function end up using a bit more stack space?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. Which type of threads in Windows have a very limited stack space?

Q. What is the disadvantage of the function's stack unwinding approach from the program's perspective?

Q. Why is it important to ensure that the code that’s accessing a large block of stack space is properly aware of its size?

Q. What are intrinsic implementations?

Q. Why are string-manipulation routines historically a reason for vulnerabilities?

Q. What is the aim of using automatic, compiler-generated stack checking?

Q. How does automatic, compiler-generated stack checking work?

Q. What is the purpose of the cookie used in stack checking?

Q. Why does the cookie used in stack checking need to be a random number?

Q. How does the use of a pseudorandom number as a cookie prevent an attacker from fooling the cookie verification code?

Q. What is stack checking?

Q. How does stack checking work?

Q. Why must the cookie be a random number in stack checking?

Q. Can stack checking completely eliminate the problem of buffer overflow bugs?

Q. How can an attacker defeat stack checking?

Q. What is nonexecutable memory?

Q. Which processors provide support for nonexecutable memory?

Q. Which operating systems support nonexecutable memory?

Q. Does nonexecutable memory completely eliminate the problem of buffer overflow attacks?

Q. What is the most popular strategy for attackers to overcome the hurdles imposed by nonexecutable memory systems?