adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Why must the cookie be a random number in stack checking?

a.

To make it more difficult for an attacker to bypass the stack protection

b.

To make it easier for an attacker to bypass the stack protection

c.

To make the code more efficient

d.

None of the above

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (a).To make it more difficult for an attacker to bypass the stack protection Explanation:The cookie must be a random number to make it more difficult for an attacker to bypass the stack protection.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Why must the cookie be a random number in stack checking?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. Can stack checking completely eliminate the problem of buffer overflow bugs?

Q. How can an attacker defeat stack checking?

Q. What is nonexecutable memory?

Q. Which processors provide support for nonexecutable memory?

Q. Which operating systems support nonexecutable memory?

Q. Does nonexecutable memory completely eliminate the problem of buffer overflow attacks?

Q. What is the most popular strategy for attackers to overcome the hurdles imposed by nonexecutable memory systems?

Q. Which option is used for returning values to the caller in functions?

Q. Which type of vulnerability is required for an attacker to exploit the buffer overflow bug?

Q. What is the purpose of stack-checking mechanisms embedded into programs?

Q. What is a heap overflow?

Q. How does a heap overflow attack work?

Q. How are heaps arranged?

Q. What causes the program to crash in a heap overflow attack?

Q. How can attackers take advantage of the heap's linked-list structure?

Q. Why are heap overflows less common than stack overflows?

Q. What is the most common example of overflow attacks?

Q. What is the risk of using the strcpy function?

Q. What are heap overflows and why are they less common than stack overflows?

Q. What is the most common example of string-related overflow attacks?