adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

In engineering and physics, how are continuous and discrete phenomena typically regarded?

a.

Continuous phenomena are the exception, while discrete phenomena are normal.

b.

Both continuous and discrete phenomena are considered equally important.

c.

Discrete phenomena are the exception, while continuous phenomena are normal.

d.

Continuous phenomena are only relevant in virtual reality systems.

Answer: (c).Discrete phenomena are the exception, while continuous phenomena are normal. Explanation:In engineering and physics, continuous phenomena are often considered the norm, while discrete phenomena are seen as exceptions. This is contrasted with some human-computer interaction models where discrete events are often emphasized.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. In engineering and physics, how are continuous and discrete phenomena typically regarded?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the main difference between the systems theory model and the status–event analysis (S–E) model?

Q. How are event phenomena typically treated in systems theory and applied mathematics?

Q. What is the impact of treating everything as continuous in modeling behavior?

Q. Why might one be forced to invent events when applying systems theory to a real example?

Q. In which contexts might the merging of event-based and continuous status behavior be a concern?

Q. What is the general approach of the control systems community when dealing with hybrid systems?

Q. What is a characteristic feature of hybrid Petri nets used in the TACIT project?

Q. What is the purpose of the enable/disable switch in the component/interactor models for virtual environments?

Q. What challenge do electronic calendar systems often pose to users?

Q. What is the purpose of using closed (inclusive) and open (exclusive) intervals in formalizing time intervals?

Q. What is a characteristic feature of temporal Gestalt phenomena in continuous media?

Q. Why might the notations and models for continuous interaction appear similar?

Q. Which type of formalism is used to specify system behavior for communication between designers and implementors, as well as for analysis?

Q. Which type of logic is used to discuss permitted actions and issues of responsibility?

Q. The PIE model is an interaction model that addresses general classes of systems and describes properties like:

Q. What issue does the PIE model help uncover?

Q. Which type of interaction models cover timing properties and user attention?

Q. What do status–event analysis concepts highlight in interaction models?

Q. What do hybrid systems deal with in the context of continuous time interactions?

Q. What is the challenge related to informal notions of time and formal time specifications?