adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Why might the notations and models for continuous interaction appear similar?

a.

Due to the limited applications of continuous interaction in real-world systems.

b.

Because the physical world is mostly continuous, leaving fewer modeling choices.

c.

Because continuous interaction models are inherently simpler to create.

d.

Because human discourse and language are inherently continuous.

Answer: (b).Because the physical world is mostly continuous, leaving fewer modeling choices. Explanation:The notations and models for continuous interaction may appear similar because the physical world is largely continuous, leaving fewer modeling choices when representing continuous interactions. This reflects the nature of real-world phenomena.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Why might the notations and models for continuous interaction appear similar?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is a characteristic feature of temporal Gestalt phenomena in continuous media?

Q. What is the purpose of using closed (inclusive) and open (exclusive) intervals in formalizing time intervals?

Q. What challenge do electronic calendar systems often pose to users?

Q. What is the purpose of the enable/disable switch in the component/interactor models for virtual environments?

Q. What is a characteristic feature of hybrid Petri nets used in the TACIT project?

Q. What is the general approach of the control systems community when dealing with hybrid systems?

Q. In which contexts might the merging of event-based and continuous status behavior be a concern?

Q. Why might one be forced to invent events when applying systems theory to a real example?

Q. What is the impact of treating everything as continuous in modeling behavior?

Q. How are event phenomena typically treated in systems theory and applied mathematics?

Q. What is the main difference between the systems theory model and the status–event analysis (S–E) model?

Q. In engineering and physics, how are continuous and discrete phenomena typically regarded?

Q. What is the role of status phenomena in status–event analysis?

Q. What is the purpose of status-change events in status–event analysis?

Q. What distinguishes status–event analysis from discrete models of interaction?

Q. What is the main purpose of interstitial behavior in status–event analysis?

Q. What os meant by "event-in/status-out" in the context of the PIE model?

Q. Which of the following is NOT an example of continuous behavior?

Q. Why are there few models of continuous real-time interaction in the HCI literature?

Q. What do "Dynamic pointers" models primarily focus on?