adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Why might a mixed notation involving both events and state be preferred when describing production rules for dialogs?

a.

It simplifies the memory management process.

b.

It guarantees the proper execution of rules.

c.

It ensures a linear increase in the number of rules.

d.

It allows for different aspects of the dialog to be described effectively.

Answer: (d).It allows for different aspects of the dialog to be described effectively. Explanation:A mixed notation involving both events and state is preferred because it allows for different aspects of the dialog to be described effectively, as some aspects are best described using events and others using attributes.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Why might a mixed notation involving both events and state be preferred when describing production rules for dialogs?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What does the notation "event: condition → action" signify in production rules?

Q. How are concurrent dialog elements typically represented using production rule systems?

Q. How does the number of rules required for toggles in a mixed event/state production system scale with the number of toggles?

Q. How can the concept of "escape" be implemented using production rules?

Q. What limitation do production rules have when it comes to sequential dialogs?

Q. What is a potential advantage of using different precedence rules for firing production rules?

Q. How does a mixed event/state production system overcome the limitations of sequential dialogs?

Q. In the context of rule precedence, how might cursor movement events in a word processor be handled?

Q. What is a key advantage of a mixed event/state production system over STNs for handling concurrency and sequence?

Q. Why is CSP (Communicating Sequential Processes) chosen as a notation for dialog specification?

Q. In CSP notation, what does the symbol '→' represent?

Q. Which symbol is used for parallel composition of processes in CSP notation?

Q. What is a key advantage of using parallel composition in CSP notation for dialog descriptions?

Q. What is the purpose of using internal events in CSP notation?

Q. Why might causality be ambiguous when using CSP notation for dialog descriptions?

Q. How can the ambiguity of causality in CSP notation be addressed?

Q. What is the main advantage of CSP notation over production rules for handling both concurrency and sequence?

Q. Which term is used in CSP notation to denote the process that waits for user mouse actions?

Q. What does parallel composition of processes in CSP notation achieve for the user interface?

Q. What distinguishes dynamic screen presentations from static screen presentations in interfaces?