adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

How does a mixed event/state production system overcome the limitations of sequential dialogs?

a.

By adding more attributes to the system's memory

b.

By relying solely on state attributes

c.

By using a complex syntax for rule descriptions

d.

By combining the strengths of event and state representations

Answer: (d).By combining the strengths of event and state representations Explanation:A mixed event/state production system overcomes the limitations of sequential dialogs by combining the strengths of both event and state representations, allowing for more flexibility in describing complex sequences.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. How does a mixed event/state production system overcome the limitations of sequential dialogs?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. In the context of rule precedence, how might cursor movement events in a word processor be handled?

Q. What is a key advantage of a mixed event/state production system over STNs for handling concurrency and sequence?

Q. Why is CSP (Communicating Sequential Processes) chosen as a notation for dialog specification?

Q. In CSP notation, what does the symbol '→' represent?

Q. Which symbol is used for parallel composition of processes in CSP notation?

Q. What is a key advantage of using parallel composition in CSP notation for dialog descriptions?

Q. What is the purpose of using internal events in CSP notation?

Q. Why might causality be ambiguous when using CSP notation for dialog descriptions?

Q. How can the ambiguity of causality in CSP notation be addressed?

Q. What is the main advantage of CSP notation over production rules for handling both concurrency and sequence?

Q. Which term is used in CSP notation to denote the process that waits for user mouse actions?

Q. What does parallel composition of processes in CSP notation achieve for the user interface?

Q. What distinguishes dynamic screen presentations from static screen presentations in interfaces?

Q. What is the primary difference between static and dynamic dialog structures?

Q. Which type of systems might be more likely to have dynamic dialog structures?

Q. What is the significance of parametrization in the context of dynamic dialog structures?

Q. How can the complexity of dynamic dialog structures affect their analysis?

Q. When might it be preferable to use more static forms of representation for encoding dialogs?

Q. What are the two aspects of dialog semantics?

Q. What is the primary purpose of having notation-specific semantics for a dialog?