adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

In an event-oriented production rule system, why are events removed from memory after being used in the condition of a rule?

a.

To simplify the event tracking process

b.

To improve system performance

c.

To make permanent status information feasible

d.

To prevent the events from firing again

Answer: (c).To make permanent status information feasible Explanation:Events are removed from memory after being used in the condition of a rule to allow for new events to be processed and to make permanent status information difficult to represent.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. In an event-oriented production rule system, why are events removed from memory after being used in the condition of a rule?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. In state-oriented production rule systems, how are named values (attributes) managed when a rule fires?

Q. What is a key characteristic of state-oriented production rule systems in contrast to event-oriented systems?

Q. What term is used to describe the system's set of named values in a state-oriented production rule system?

Q. What effect does the persistence of attributes have on the firing of rules in state-oriented production rule systems?

Q. Why might a mixed notation involving both events and state be preferred when describing production rules for dialogs?

Q. What does the notation "event: condition → action" signify in production rules?

Q. How are concurrent dialog elements typically represented using production rule systems?

Q. How does the number of rules required for toggles in a mixed event/state production system scale with the number of toggles?

Q. How can the concept of "escape" be implemented using production rules?

Q. What limitation do production rules have when it comes to sequential dialogs?

Q. What is a potential advantage of using different precedence rules for firing production rules?

Q. How does a mixed event/state production system overcome the limitations of sequential dialogs?

Q. In the context of rule precedence, how might cursor movement events in a word processor be handled?

Q. What is a key advantage of a mixed event/state production system over STNs for handling concurrency and sequence?

Q. Why is CSP (Communicating Sequential Processes) chosen as a notation for dialog specification?

Q. In CSP notation, what does the symbol '→' represent?

Q. Which symbol is used for parallel composition of processes in CSP notation?

Q. What is a key advantage of using parallel composition in CSP notation for dialog descriptions?

Q. What is the purpose of using internal events in CSP notation?

Q. Why might causality be ambiguous when using CSP notation for dialog descriptions?