adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Why might arranging suitable time slots for group experiments be challenging?

a.

Participants in group experiments are often not available.

b.

Group experiments tend to be shorter, creating scheduling difficulties.

c.

Group experiments usually involve fewer participants.

d.

Equipment availability and participants' schedules need to align.

Answer: (d).Equipment availability and participants' schedules need to align. Explanation:Scheduling group experiments can be challenging because it requires coordinating the availability of both participants and equipment, which may include multiple workstations.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Why might arranging suitable time slots for group experiments be challenging?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What factor influences the choice of experimental tasks for group studies of groupware systems?

Q. What kind of tasks are often used in group experiments to encourage active cooperation and consensus-building?

Q. In the context of group experiments, what might be a challenge when interpreting results involving a small number of participant groups?

Q. In decision games used for cooperative activity training, what is often emphasized for success?

Q. Which of the following scenarios involves a task that requires group coordination and cooperation?

Q. How do time-critical simulated process control tasks impact group interaction?

Q. What is one challenge related to data gathering in group experiments compared to single-user experiments?

Q. How can data gathering be managed in group experiments to recreate participants' perspectives?

Q. What is an advantage of recording group interactions using synchronized clocks for each participant?

Q. Why is statistical analysis challenging in group experiments compared to single-user experiments?

Q. How does the presence of dominant participants and varied group dynamics impact experimental results in group studies?

Q. In a group experiment, what factor can lead to the need for a larger number of groups to achieve statistical significance?

Q. Why might the challenge of gathering a sufficient number of experimental groups be more pronounced in group experiments compared to single-user experiments?

Q. In group experiments, what is one advantage of using microanalysis of features like gaps between utterances?

Q. What is a possible advantage of opting for a more anecdotal analysis of group experiments?

Q. Why might attempts at controlled experiments with limited experimental groups be challenging in the context of group-working studies?

Q. How does ethnography differ from the experimental perspective in studying group interactions?

Q. What is a challenge associated with conducting field studies with groups in experimental situations?

Q. What is the main advantage of using the think aloud technique in user observation?

Q. How can the process of observation using think aloud be affected by the act of describing one's actions?