adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

How does the presence of dominant participants and varied group dynamics impact experimental results in group studies?

a.

It leads to statistically significant results in all cases.

b.

It minimizes the impact of individual differences.

c.

It reduces the need for statistical analysis.

d.

It may lead to non-significant results even with extreme differences in performance.

Answer: (d).It may lead to non-significant results even with extreme differences in performance. Explanation:The presence of dominant participants and varied group dynamics can lead to non-significant results even when there are extreme differences in performance between conditions.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. How does the presence of dominant participants and varied group dynamics impact experimental results in group studies?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. In a group experiment, what factor can lead to the need for a larger number of groups to achieve statistical significance?

Q. Why might the challenge of gathering a sufficient number of experimental groups be more pronounced in group experiments compared to single-user experiments?

Q. In group experiments, what is one advantage of using microanalysis of features like gaps between utterances?

Q. What is a possible advantage of opting for a more anecdotal analysis of group experiments?

Q. Why might attempts at controlled experiments with limited experimental groups be challenging in the context of group-working studies?

Q. How does ethnography differ from the experimental perspective in studying group interactions?

Q. What is a challenge associated with conducting field studies with groups in experimental situations?

Q. What is the main advantage of using the think aloud technique in user observation?

Q. How can the process of observation using think aloud be affected by the act of describing one's actions?

Q. What is cooperative evaluation as a variation of think aloud?

Q. What is the primary focus of the recording method used in think aloud sessions?

Q. What is the term used to describe the record of an evaluation session using techniques like think aloud?

Q. What is a potential limitation of using paper and pencil for recording user actions during an evaluation session?

Q. What can coding schemes for frequent activities help improve during user action recording?

Q. What is a benefit of audio recording during user observation?

Q. What is a challenge associated with video recording during user observation?

Q. Which of the following methods allows capturing both the user's actions and their interactions with a computer screen?

Q. What is a characteristic of computer logging for user actions?

Q. What does computer logging primarily capture during user interaction?

Q. What are the advantages of using computer logging for user observation?