adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

According to Nielsen's heuristic for "Match between system and the real world," how should the system communicate with the user?

a.

Using technical and system-oriented terms

b.

Following platform conventions and standards

c.

Speaking the user's language and using familiar concepts

d.

Using minimalistic design and aesthetics

Answer: (c).Speaking the user's language and using familiar concepts Explanation:The heuristic "Match between system and the real world" suggests that the system should be designed to use language, words, phrases, and concepts that are familiar to the user. It should avoid using technical jargon and system-oriented terms that might confuse users. Instead, it should follow real-world conventions and present information in a natural and logical order that aligns with the user's understanding.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. According to Nielsen's heuristic for "Match between system and the real world," how should the system communicate with the user?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the purpose of providing an "emergency exit" in a system, as per Nielsen's heuristics?

Q. Nielsen's heuristic of "Flexibility and efficiency of use" suggests allowing users to:

Q. In the context of Nielsen's heuristics, what is the purpose of "aesthetic and minimalist design"?

Q. What is the recommended approach for expressing error messages, according to Nielsen's heuristics?

Q. Which heuristic suggests that help and documentation should be focused on the user's task and easy to search?

Q. After independent evaluations in heuristic evaluation, what is the next step in the process?

Q. What is the GOMS model used for in evaluation?

Q. What is the purpose of using the keystroke-level model in evaluation?

Q. How does design rationale contribute to evaluation during the design stage?

Q. Which type of models can be used to evaluate dialog sequences for problems?

Q. What is the purpose of using previous experimental results in evaluation?

Q. What is the advantage of using previous experimental results in evaluation?

Q. What should an expert reviewer consider when using previous experimental results for evaluation?

Q. Why is expertise necessary for using previous experimental results in evaluation?

Q. Which evaluation style involves conducting tests with users in a controlled environment away from their normal work setting?

Q. What is a benefit of conducting laboratory studies for usability evaluation?

Q. In which situations might laboratory observation be the only option for usability evaluation?

Q. What limitation of laboratory studies can affect the accuracy of observations made during evaluation?

Q. Which expert-based evaluation approach involves evaluators stepping through a sequence of user actions to identify potential usability problems?

Q. What is the primary focus of cognitive walkthroughs in terms of user interaction?