adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What are the problems in the relation between what is actually measured (module structure, defects encountered, etc.) and the attribute of interest in software quality?

a.

Difficulty in reconciling engineer-oriented quality views with user-oriented 'fitness for use' aspects.

b.

Inability to support the relation with a sound hypothesis.

c.

Lack of a good measure of program complexity.

d.

All of the above.

Posted under Software Engineering

Answer: (d).All of the above. Explanation:For most quality attributes, the relation between what is actually measured and the attribute of interest is insufficiently supported by a sound hypothesis. The difficulty in reconciling engineer-oriented quality views with user-oriented 'fitness for use' aspects and the example of the number of decisions (essentially McCabe’s cyclomatic complexity) not being a good measure of program complexity.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What are the problems in the relation between what is actually measured (module structure, defects encountered, etc.) and the attribute of interest in software quality?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the principle of "closed loop" in software quality management?

Q. What actions were taken based on the results of the study on reasons for delay in software development?

Q. What is the example of an approach to identifying reasons for delay in software development?

Q. What are the steps in discovering opportunities for process improvement in an organization?

Q. What is the example of a problem that could occur if a simple approach like imposing an upperbound on the complexity allowed for each component is applied?

Q. What is the importance of having sound hypotheses while interpreting the data collected?

Q. What should the development organization do to actively produce quality software products?

Q. What are the alternatives to CMM's original levels of maturity?

Q. How does CMM compare to BOOTSTRAP and SPICE?

Q. What are the demands on the reliability of maturity assessments according to CMM?

Q. What is the implication of maturity assessments according to CMM?

Q. How does CMM's original levels compare to an instrument panel of an airplane?

Q. What is the consequence of the rather crude assessment of organizations on a five-point scale?

Q. What is the issue with CMM's original maturity levels?

Q. How does the dichotomy between factory-like and craft-like aspects of software engineering relate to CMM?

Q. What is the focus of CMM?

Q. Does the Personal Software Process (PSP) alleviate the criticism of CMM for small companies?

Q. Is the SEI's Capability Maturity Model appropriate for small companies?

Q. What is the danger of organizations focusing on obtaining CMM or ISO 9000 certification?

Q. What is the focus of SPICE?