adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Why is the STAR schema considered to be intuitively understood by users?

a.

It contains highly normalized tables.

b.

It uses complex join paths.

c.

It aligns with the way users visualize relationships.

d.

It requires extensive training for users to comprehend.

Answer: (c).It aligns with the way users visualize relationships. Explanation:The STAR schema aligns with the way users normally visualize relationships and, therefore, is intuitively understood by them.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Why is the STAR schema considered to be intuitively understood by users?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. How does the STAR schema differ from the relational schema of an OLTP system in terms of user-friendliness?

Q. In a data warehouse, what distinguishes users of decision support systems, such as data warehouses, from users of OLTP systems?

Q. In the context of a STAR schema, what does "denormalized" refer to?

Q. What is one of the key advantages of the STAR schema for data warehousing?

Q. When might a denormalized dimension table not be desirable in a STAR schema?

Q. What is the fundamental difference between the STAR schema and relational schemas for OLTP systems?

Q. Which option is commonly used for defining primary keys in a STAR schema fact table?

Q. In a STAR schema, why must the primary key of each dimension table also be a foreign key in the fact table?

Q. Why do dimension tables often use surrogate keys?

Q. How are operational system keys typically handled in dimension tables when surrogate keys are used?

Q. What are surrogate keys in dimension tables?

Q. What is the first principle to consider when choosing primary keys for dimension tables?

Q. What issues can arise when using operational system keys as primary keys for dimension tables?

Q. In a dimension table, what is the primary key used for?

Q. Why do data warehouses feed data into data mining applications?

Q. How do granular fact tables facilitate "graceful" changes to data models?

Q. What are the natural lowest levels of dimensions in a fact table?

Q. What is one advantage of keeping the fact table at the lowest granularity level?

Q. In a factless fact table representing student attendance, what value is typically recorded in each row to indicate attendance?

Q. What is a factless fact table?