adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What is one advantage of keeping the fact table at the lowest granularity level?

a.

Improved query performance

b.

Reduced storage requirements

c.

Simplicity in data modeling

d.

Faster data extraction from operational systems

Answer: (a).Improved query performance Explanation:Keeping the fact table at the lowest granularity level allows for efficient drill-down and roll-up operations, leading to improved query performance.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What is one advantage of keeping the fact table at the lowest granularity level?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What are the natural lowest levels of dimensions in a fact table?

Q. How do granular fact tables facilitate "graceful" changes to data models?

Q. Why do data warehouses feed data into data mining applications?

Q. In a dimension table, what is the primary key used for?

Q. What issues can arise when using operational system keys as primary keys for dimension tables?

Q. What is the first principle to consider when choosing primary keys for dimension tables?

Q. What are surrogate keys in dimension tables?

Q. How are operational system keys typically handled in dimension tables when surrogate keys are used?

Q. Why do dimension tables often use surrogate keys?

Q. In a STAR schema, why must the primary key of each dimension table also be a foreign key in the fact table?

Q. Which option is commonly used for defining primary keys in a STAR schema fact table?

Q. What is the fundamental difference between the STAR schema and relational schemas for OLTP systems?

Q. When might a denormalized dimension table not be desirable in a STAR schema?

Q. What is one of the key advantages of the STAR schema for data warehousing?

Q. In the context of a STAR schema, what does "denormalized" refer to?

Q. In a data warehouse, what distinguishes users of decision support systems, such as data warehouses, from users of OLTP systems?

Q. How does the STAR schema differ from the relational schema of an OLTP system in terms of user-friendliness?

Q. Why is the STAR schema considered to be intuitively understood by users?

Q. How does the STAR schema optimize navigation in the database?

Q. In the context of a STAR schema, what happens when you have a seemingly complex query to resolve a specific problem?