adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Why is reversing IL code easier than reversing IA-32?

a.

There are less redundant details in IL code

b.

There are more relevant details in IL code

c.

IL code contains accurate data type information

d.

All of the above

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (d).All of the above Explanation:IL code contains less redundant details such as flags and registers and more relevant details such as class definitions and accurate data type information.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Why is reversing IL code easier than reversing IA-32?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. Is there a need to read raw IL code?

Q. Why is there rarely a reason to read raw IL code?

Q. What makes reversing IL code easier than reversing native assembly language such as IA-32?

Q. Why is it rarely necessary to read raw IL code?

Q. What is program comprehension?

Q. What is the benefit of using a decompiler such as Spices.Net?

Q. What is the vulnerability of .NET executables that makes obfuscation necessary?

Q. What is the common strategy for obfuscating .NET executables?

Q. Can obfuscation prevent reverse engineering of .NET executables completely?

Q. Why is obfuscation more common for .NET executables than for native executables?

Q. What is the purpose of obfuscating .NET executables?

Q. Why is renaming symbols a common strategy for obfuscating .NET executables?

Q. What is control flow obfuscation?

Q. What is one feature of popular obfuscators such as Dotfuscator and XenoCode?

Q. What is the vulnerability of .NET executables?

Q. What is the strategy for preventing decompilation in .NET executables?

Q. What is the purpose of renaming symbols in .NET executables?

Q. What is control flow obfuscation in .NET executables?

Q. What is the purpose of breaking decompilation and disassembly in .NET executables?

Q. What is the purpose of .NET obfuscators?