adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Why is it important to know what the failure message looks like when cracking?

a.

So that you can identify where in the executable the message is located.

b.

So that you can better understand the protection technology being used.

c.

So that you can create a keygen program that produces the correct failure message.

d.

So that you can avoid triggering the protection mechanism by providing the correct input values.

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (a).So that you can identify where in the executable the message is located. Explanation:One good reason to always enter bogus values into the program when cracking is so that you at least know what the failure message looks like, and that you should be able to find this message somewhere in the executable.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Why is it important to know what the failure message looks like when cracking?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the purpose of the Executable Modules window in OllyDbg?

Q. What is the purpose of examining the thread creation code in Defender's initialization routine?

Q. What is brute-forcing?

Q. What does Defender use to generate its decryption key?

Q. What is the advantage of Defender’s encryption approach?

Q. What is the encryption algorithm used in Defender?

Q. Why is it important for protection technologies to encrypt key code?

Q. What is the main difference between a simple XOR algorithm and CBC?

Q. Why is it difficult to hide the key from cracker’s eyes in copy protection technologies?

Q. What does Defender do before each function returns to the caller?

Q. Why does reencrypting each function create an inconvenience for crackers?

Q. What is the obfuscated interface in Defender?

Q. Why does the obfuscated interface make it difficult for crackers to find important code areas in the target program?

Q. How does the interface attempt to attach to the operating system?

Q. How does Defender access the operating system after the user-mode components are copied to a random memory address?

Q. What impact does the obfuscated interface have on the program's memory consumption and performance?

Q. How does Defender obfuscate the calls to operating system APIs?

Q. What is the weakness in Defender's technique of obfuscating API calls?

Q. What was the purpose of adding the call to IsDebuggerPresent API in Defender?

Q. What is the impact of obfuscating the interface with the operating system?