adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Why is it important for protection technologies to encrypt key code?

a.

To prevent crackers from elegantly loading the program in a disassembler such as IDA Pro and easily analyzing the entire program.

b.

To make it more difficult to set breakpoints on the code.

c.

To prevent automatic unpackers from decrypting the entire program.

d.

All of the above

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (d).All of the above Explanation:Encrypting key code prevents crackers from easily analyzing the entire program, makes it more difficult to set breakpoints on the code, and prevents automatic unpackers from decrypting the entire program.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Why is it important for protection technologies to encrypt key code?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the main difference between a simple XOR algorithm and CBC?

Q. Why is it difficult to hide the key from cracker’s eyes in copy protection technologies?

Q. What does Defender do before each function returns to the caller?

Q. Why does reencrypting each function create an inconvenience for crackers?

Q. What is the obfuscated interface in Defender?

Q. Why does the obfuscated interface make it difficult for crackers to find important code areas in the target program?

Q. How does the interface attempt to attach to the operating system?

Q. How does Defender access the operating system after the user-mode components are copied to a random memory address?

Q. What impact does the obfuscated interface have on the program's memory consumption and performance?

Q. How does Defender obfuscate the calls to operating system APIs?

Q. What is the weakness in Defender's technique of obfuscating API calls?

Q. What was the purpose of adding the call to IsDebuggerPresent API in Defender?

Q. What is the impact of obfuscating the interface with the operating system?

Q. What is the purpose of the Processor Time-Stamp Verification Thread in Defender?

Q. Why is it important to directly access the hardware time-stamp counter using a low-level instruction in the Processor Time-Stamp Verification Thread?

Q. What would happen if the encryption on each key function was not implemented in the Processor Time-Stamp Verification Thread?

Q. What modifications can be made to a time-stamp verification thread to make it more difficult to remove?

Q. Is the current implementation of the verification thread safe for commercial use?

Q. What changes should be made to the counter constant in a commercial product environment?

Q. What priority should the verification thread be set to in a commercial product environment?